Donald Trump may not want to admit it but his ban on travel is a Muslim ban

crew-2231211Of course this isn’t the politically correct thing to admit or discuss as he takes office but I believe U.S. Congressman Keith Ellison, (D-MN) is right on this one.

 

Keith Ellison: President Trump ‘Can’t Deny’ This is a Muslim Ban!

Perhaps the racist, Muslim, Ellison in right for the first time?

Of course President Trump can ban Muslims from coming to the United States.
trumpmuslimban-65
He’s doing so until each immigrant is properly vetted.
Those who have practiced Sharia on their wives and daughters through so-called honor killings won’t make the cut.
islam-death-cultProtester’s need to wake up, Islam is not a religion of peace it is a cult of death.
Classifying Islam as one of the worlds great religions is completely laughable.
What true religion kills its followers who desire to leave the brainwashing?
What religion treats its wives and daughters as though they were lower life forms than the sheep and goats?
 

Sunday on  CBS’s “Face the Nation,”discussing President Donald Trump executive order halting immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries into the United States, Democratic National Committee chair hopeful Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) said the action was “a Muslim ban” and the Trump administration “can’t deny it is a Muslim ban.”

 

 

Ellison said, “You know what, we never have had a religious based ban before.

This is a Muslim ban and they can’t deny it is a Muslim ban.

On the campaign trail he said he wanted a Muslim ban.

He said on national television there would be other religious groups receiving priority.

This is a Muslim ban.

Rudy Giuliani who helped him write it said they started with the intention of a  Muslim ban and then languaged it up to avoid that label.

It is a religiously based ban which is something that — our constitution says congress shall make no law establishing a religion or bridge free exercise there of.

This is a violation of equal protection.

It’s a religiously based ban.”

Except Islam is not a religion!

 

THE END

Advertisements

About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in Donald Trump may not want to admit it but his ban on travel is a Muslim ban and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Donald Trump may not want to admit it but his ban on travel is a Muslim ban

  1. Dave the Differentiat says:

    Ellison is a Muslim and LIAR.

    Islam is a cult which requires all followers to take an Oath to Sharia Law.

    Because Islam has this requirement it follows that any Muslims cannot ever be an American.

    ALL Americans take an Oath to Support and Defend the Constitution.

    THE OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION

    The oath of office of the President of the United States is an oath or affirmation required by the United States Constitution before the President begins the execution of the office. The wording is specified in Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight:
    Before he enters the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:— “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
    The Oath to Uphold the Constitution

    Article VI clause 3 of the United States Constitution requires that all who hold office in the United States take an oath to uphold the United States Constitution: “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…”

    In compliance with this requirement, as they enter office, Members of Congress take the following oath of office:

    “I, (name of Member), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution defines and requires the President of the United States to take a specific oath as he assumes that office:

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    The United States Constitution, Article VI declares the Constitution is the “supreme law of the land,” and reinforces the requirement that judges are bound by it: “This Constitution…shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

    As immigrants to this nation obtain their United States citizenship, they are required to take the following oath:

    “I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God. In acknowledgement whereof I have hereunto affixed my signature.

    An oath is defined in Noah Webster’s 1828 dictionary thus:
    “A solemn affirmation or declaration, made with an appeal to God for the truth of what is affirmed. The appeal to God in an oath, implies that the person imprecates his vengeance and renounces his favor if the declaration is false, or if the declaration is a promise, the person invokes the vengeance of God if he should fail to fulfill it. A false oath is called perjury.”

    The requirement to agree under oath to uphold the Constitution is an unequivocal requirement to holding office. The oath of a new citizen is specific in the commitment to uphold the Constitution. The Constitution is the “supreme Law of the Land” for all citizens. Can the words of the Constitution have any other meaning than the common meanings which were well known at the time of its writing?

    The United States Constitution is The Charter of the Nation. It defines the framework of the government it establishes. It delegates authority to act in specific areas. It establishes the boundaries within which our national government may act. It is not a grant of unlimited power to act with unrestricted discretion. The primary purpose of our Constitution is to protect the people in their God-given unalienable rights.

    The value of a written constitution is beyond measure. Words have meaning, and those meanings may be known. They are not open to arbitrary and unilateral interpretation or redefinition by those who would modify the constitution to meet their whims. The words and the intended scope of the government was clearly established by those who framed the Constitution. There is an established and constitutional method for modifying the Constitution if it becomes necessary to do so. That process is defined in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. There is no other way to legally modify it. Until it is modified legally (by the method defined within Article V of the Constitution), the United States Constitution is obligatory upon all.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. malenurseken says:

    It needs to be done

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s