Jihadist Factory


The jihadist makes a bargain:


He surrenders totally to the religion of surrender in exchange for blanket security.

Islam gives him all the answers he seeks for dealing with this world and promises him a most lush and eternal paradise of Allah once he leaves it.

And leaving this world in perfect submission as the foot-soldier of the paradise’s creator gives the faithful jihadist an unimaginably glorious and sensual eternal reward in his next life.


It’s a bargain that some buy in whole, some in part.


News with Views



Bewildered by what fanatic Muslims do, some conclude that Muslims are brainwashed.

Otherwise, how can their totally illogical belief system and barbaric behavior be explained?

But the notion of “brainwashing” that is bandied about is the stuff of science fiction and Hollywood movies such as The Manchurian Candidate.

Below is pictured a female jihadist.

Besides participating in overt jihad, she brings future jihadists into the world.

Perhaps they should stick with their goats and sheep.


The human person arrives in this world with his brains already washed in the sense of being what John Locke called tabula rasa, or “clean slate,” ready to be imprinted by experience.

John Locke was only partly correct; the brain also arrives with numerous predispositions already in place.

It is a combination of life’s influences and a person’s own decisions that determine which of these dispositions develop and which ones fail. It is through this process that a unique human being is formed.

Many animals come with already-in-place programs that automatically run much of their lives.

Birds’ migration, mating courtship, and thousands of other complex behaviors are instances of this type of specific programming.

A catchword for this type of behavior is “instinct.”

As a general rule, the higher the organism, the more diminished its rigid pre-programming and the greater its latitude to exercise choices.

Making choices depends on what there is to choose from and to what extent a given choice appeals to the chooser.

And the human newborn enters the arena of life without the means of being anything other than a passive recipient of “things” already chosen for him.

It is like the old joke by Henry Ford, who reportedly told his customers that they could have the choice of color for their car as long as it was black.

Things are almost as bleak for the new arrival. He had no say in choosing his parents, his socioeconomic condition, his environment of birth, and much more.

All are already in place, and he starts life from the context of his birth.

The development of a newborn in any family is importantly influenced by many factors, among them how hands-on the parents are, how religious they are, and how severely they micromanage him in an attempt to make him not only a good person, but also a better one than they themselves are.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading

Stunning Coverup Maneuver: Obama NSC Move All Intelligence Unmasking Material To Obama Library To Avoid Sunlight

For those who understand the law, this is nothing new.


It’s the same mechanism that Obama is allowed to shield his personal records from public view once he left the White House.

The same rules applied to all occupants at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. before him.

The possible findings may include:

His actual birthplace.

Did he actually graduate from law school and become a Constitutional law instructor?

Aberrant drug use before and during his time hiding out in the Oval Office.

The big stunner here is that it had been decided years ago, that presidential sealed records would be kept in the National Archives and that presidential libraries were not to be used. (Source)



The possibility that he was a CIA operative who accompanied his Pakistani “Male companion,” Mohammed Hasen Chandoo there

Chandoo was not your average friend, mixing with the very wealthy and connected to politics, the CIA,ISI, and  M-16.


Judicial Watch

Tom Fritton

June 19, 2017

Records Sought by Judicial Watch May Remain Closed to the Public for Five Years



(Washington, DC)

Judicial Watch today announced that the National Security Council (NSC) on May 23, 2017, informed it by letter that the materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the identities of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” have been removed to the Obama Library.



The NSC will not fulfill an April 4 Judicial Watch request for records regarding information about people “who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.”

The agency also informed Judicial Watch that it would not turn over communications with any Intelligence Community member or agency concerning the alleged Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election; the hacking of DNC computers; or the suspected communications between Russia and Trump campaign/transition officials. Specifically, the NSC told Judicial Watch:

Documents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the Barack Obama Presidential Library. 

You may send your request to the Obama Library. 

However, you should be aware that under the Presidential Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five years after an administration has left office.

Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) April 4 request sought:

1.) Any and all requests for information, analyses, summaries, assessments, transcripts, or similar records submitted to any Intelligence Community member agency or any official, employee, or representative thereof by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice regarding, concerning, or related to the following:


  • Any actual or suspected effort by the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government to influence or otherwise interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
  • The alleged hacking of computer systems used by the Democratic National Committee and/or the Clinton presidential campaign.
  • Any actual or suspected communication between any member of the Trump presidential campaign or transition team and any official or employee of the Russian government or any individual acting on behalf of the Russian government.
  • The identities of U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team who were identified pursuant to intelligence collection activities.


2.) Any and all records or responses received by former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and/or any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security Council in response to any request described in part 1 of this request.

3.) Any and all records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the Department of any Intelligence Community member agency and former National Security Advisor Susan Rice and/or any member, employee, staff member, or representative of the National Security Council regarding, concerning, or related to any request described in Part 1 of this request.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading

Dirty Open Secret: US Created and Supports ISIS

This story has been repeatedly documented at our site.

It should come as no big shock to those who frequent our site.

The U.S. among others have supported, developed and paid for the formation of ISIS/ISL, the same as they did in funding Osama bin Laden’s mujahideen. (Source)


By Stephen Lendman

Global Research,

June 13, 2017



It’s one of the dirtiest of dirty open secrets.  

US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) documents prove it, obtained by Judicial Watch through a FOIA lawsuit. 

They show ISIS, al-Qaeda and like-minded terrorist groups are the “major forces” used as US foot soldiers in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. 

The myth of so-called “moderate rebels” was long ago discredited.


The DIA documents show America, NATO, Saudi Arabia and other regional rogue states support an Islamic caliphate to challenge, topple and replace Bashar al-Assad with an imperial puppet. 

Longstanding US/Israeli plans call for redrawing the Middle East map by color revolutions and wars, replacing independent governments with pro-Western puppet regimes, balkanizing Iraq, Syria, Iran and other regional countries for easier control, looting their resources, and exploiting their people. 


In a January 2016 Iran Review article, James Fetzer discussed evidence of ISIS’ creation by America. 

In February 2015, Iraq’s military “downed 2 UK cargo planes carrying weapons for ISIL,” he explained. 

In March 2015, “Iraqi popular forces…shot down a US helicopter carrying weapons for ISIL in Al-Anbar province…”



“Photographs…showing ISIS members sporting ‘US Army’ tattoos” went unreported by Western media scoundrels.

A 2012 DIA document states the West will facilitate the rise of ISIS “to isolate the Syrian regime.” 

Former CIA contractor Steven Kelly said Washington

“created ISIL for the sake of Israel,” along with assuring “never-ending war in the Middle East” to make the Jewish state the dominant regional power and provide a “constant flow of orders for weapons from the military-industrial complex at home…” 

ISIS fighters are recruited from scores of countries, including Western ones. 

In October 2015, Russian lower house State Duma International Affairs Committee chairman Alexi Pushkov explained America is

“not bombing ISIS at all…Obama is lying to the American people.” 


See the entire article below.


Continue reading

The Attack on London: Prime Minister Theresa May Just Said What?

Prime Minister, Theresa May, demonstrates by her words and actions illustrated in the Wall Street Journal below, that she like most of the leaders in Western Europe have not come to terms with Islamic Jihadists.


June 7, 2017

Theresa May has apparently just overdosed on caffeine and said this. (Source)


She offers more useless bromides and wishful thinking.

Call it creative appeasement if you will.

Has this worked in any host country where it has been applied?

Of course not, Islam’s goal is singular.


That, unfortunately, will not make a dent in the acts of terror inflicted on her country and the world over.

Killing these brainwashed, inbred zealots must become priority number one among her other agendas.

Perhaps she will be removed from office and the situation will become moot.


The Wall Street Journal

By Scott Johnson

June 6, 2017


Writing in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal as Theodore Dalrymple, the great Dr. Daniels gives us the quote of the day on the London Bridge attacks: “As Prime Minister Theresa May rightly said after the most recent atrocities in London, what the terrorists have in common is an ideology.



New British Prime Minister Theresa May speaks to the media outside her official residence,10 Downing Street in London, Wednesday June 7th. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

She rightly called it evil, but it is also ignorant: It makes the Baader-Meinhof Gang look like Aristotle.”


Here are her observations that hit close to home:

An ideology, however stupid, is not easy to destroy; believing six impossible things before breakfast is almost par for the human course.

One obvious thing to do would be to strangle the foreign funding of so much Islamist activity in Britain.

 That is no doubt complicated in many ways, but no British government, solicitous of trade relations, has dared even try.

The British economy is precarious, and it is difficult to be strong when your economy is weak.

Instead, we have gone in for what a Dutch friend of mine calls “creative appeasement.”

Authorities make concessions even before, one suspects, there have been any demands for them.

Thus, a public library in Birmingham, one of the largest known to me, has installed women-only tables, a euphemism for Muslim women only.

Whether there was ever a request or demand for sex-segregated seating from Muslims is probably undiscoverable; truth seldom emerges from a public authority.

But the justification would almost certainly be that without such tables, Muslim women would not be able to use the library at all.

The Birmingham airport has set aside a room for wudu, the Muslim ablutions before prayer.

No other religion is catered for in this fashion (nor should they be, in my opinion), so the impression is inevitably given that Islam is in some way favored or privileged.

Again, it would be difficult to find out whether they received requests or demands for such a room or merely anticipated them; in either case, weakness is advertised.

This is not a local problem alone….

From all this the terrorists surely draw a great deal of comfort.

It gives them the impression of living in a weak society that will be easy to destroy, so that their acts are not in the least nihilistic or pointless, as is often claimed.

They perceive ours as a candle-and-teddy-bear society (albeit mysteriously endowed with technological prowess): We kill, you light candles.

The other day I passed a teddy-bear shop, that is to say a shop that sold nothing but teddy bears.

I am sure that terrorism is good for business, but the teddy bears are more reassuring for the terrorists than for those who buy them to place on the site of the latest outrage.

That “creative appeasement,” it’s not just a European phenomenon, of course. It is

It is a cancer that is metastasizing throughout the Western world.

To take just one pointed example, Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges recently gave her state of the city address in a local mosque.

If the ideology of Islamist terrorism is stupid, it’s got nothing on the left’s creative appeasers.



Continue reading

Fearing Trump’s next move, liberals urge Supreme Court conservative Kennedy to stay


Justice Anthony  Kennedy a conservative?  Hardly!


A close examination of his decisions below clearly demonstrates that he voted his conscious and followed the U.S. Constitution to the best of his ability as he swore to do upon being sworn into the highest court in the land.


Of course, the progressive socialists’ don’t want him to leave he isn’t a liberal demagogue like Sotomayor and Keagan.

Coming up on his 81st birthday in July, perhaps he has served his country long enough and would like to retire and enjoy the rest of his life with his family.

Why Supreme Court Justices in the United States are appointed for life. (Source)




By Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung
June 1, 2017

Liberal activists are urging U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, a conservative with whom they often disagree, to put off any thought of retirement, fearing President Donald Trump would replace him with a jurist further to the right.

The Liberal Democrats’ keep-Kennedy campaign, being pursued publicly and privately, reflects how powerless they have become against the Republican president when it comes to high court vacancies since the Senate in April reduced the vote tally needed to confirm a Supreme Court nomination to 51 from 60.


It also shows how big the stakes are for both sides in any decision that Kennedy, who turns 81 in July, makes about his future on the court.

If he were to retire, Trump would have a historic opportunity to recast the court in a more conservative posture, possibly for decades to come.

Some former Kennedy clerks have said he is thinking about retirement. He has declined to comment on his plans, despite requests from many media outlets including Reuters.

Right now, Kennedy “is the most important man in America.

He is the vote that swings the court on the most important cases that reach it,” said Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a left-leaning think tank.

Nominated by Republican President Ronald Reagan in 1987 to a lifetime court seat, Kennedy has been a crucial swing vote on the nine-member court for more than a decade.

On most issues, such as campaign finance and religious rights, he has voted with fellow conservatives.

He also voted with the minority to strike down the 2010 Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.

But on gay rights and abortion, he has sided with the court’s four liberals.

If he stays in his post, the court’s long-standing ideological balance will be preserved. If he quits, Trump could replace him with someone who tilts further right, giving conservatives a solid five-vote majority.

Wydra and other liberals are lionizing Kennedy and his legacy in the media.

Some are reaching out to former Kennedy clerks and others who know him, asking them to urge him not to retire, said Michele Jawando, a legal advocate at the Center for American Progress think tank in Washington.

One former Kennedy clerk confirmed being asked to urge him to stay on and said other clerks had asked him to do so.

Other clerks said they had not been approached by liberal activists.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading

House Intelligence Panel Issues Seven Subpoenas in Russia Probe

Would Democrats have done this?


Of course not, they would have drug it out and prevented the business of sausage making to go on indefinitely.

Wasn’t there something said about the only people who don’t want, to tell the truth, have something to hide?

Doesn’t this rise to the level of requesting a special prosecutor? 

Can you hear me laughing? Then turn off your iPod and pop in your hearing aids! 🙂


Former CIA Director John Brennan testifies before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence last week. Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Brennan’s word must be suspect, as a converted Muslim and sycophant, we could have a more productive hearing grilling Hillary and Obama under oath.



The Republican-led committee issued four subpoenas related to the Russia investigation. Three subpoenas are related to questions about how and why the names of associates of President Donald Trump were unredacted and distributed within classified reports by Obama administration officials during the transition between administrations


Three subpoenas are related to questions about how and why the names of associates of President Donald Trump were unredacted and distributed within classified reports by Obama administration officials during the transition between administrations

The committee has subpoenaed the National Security Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency for information about what is called “unmasking.” Republicans on the committee have pushed for a thorough investigation of how the names of Trump campaign officials became exposed in classified intelligence reports based

Republicans on the committee have pushed for a thorough investigation of how the names of Trump campaign officials became exposed in classified intelligence reports based off intelligence community intercepts.

Those subpoenas seek information on requests made by former national security adviser Susan Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan and former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power for names to be unmasked in classified material.

The three didn’t personally receive subpoenas, the people familiar with the matter said. Mr. Brennan, Ms. Rice and Ms. Power didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. WHY?.


See the entire article below.


Continue reading

Welcome To The Liars Club

By Jim Campbell

May 20, 2017


Possible Sources For Scumedia’s Sand-In-The-Vagina Hysterics Against Trump Are Legion.

Where the progressive speaks there are no rules of engagement.

The intern who makes copies and gets donuts qualifies as a Former White House Official as far as the media is concerned. 

They won’t identify them anyway because they aren’t Republicans, so what’s the difference? 


Image: Earl

They’ll use the title to verify the fake news regardless.

Until a source is named, their testimony is assumed to be a vaporous fabrication, and it their testimony is assumed to be a vaporous fabrication, and it would be reported with skepticism, not applause, by an honest media.


Until a source is named, their testimony is assumed to be a vaporous fabrication, and it would be reported their testimony is assumed to be a vaporous fabrication, and it would be reported.

But we’re fresh out of that, aren’t we?



Continue reading