Obama implies he’ll be more vocal about issues after he leaves office

crew-2231211The big eared empty suited fool must be under one of his many delusions that anyone listened to him during his two terms.


Be more vocal about issues?

Oh yes, he’s not done with his racial divisiveness and plans to join Jesse Jackson an Al Sharpton to further gin up racial tension obama-race-cardin America.

Without a leader among them it will be interesting who tries to take charge of their efforts. 

What issues, the one you and your cabal of progressives forced upon America like your racist attitudes that divided us among all lines possible?



Your failed health care system?

Be more vocal about creating more jobs, a concept you will never grasp?

debt_emailCreating a national deficit larger than all presidents that those who proceeded you combined?

Your failed foreign policy?

The destruction of the U.S. Military and the worst of all leaving our troops in Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia in far worse shape than they were  during the administration of President George W.Bush.

How many times did you commit treason?

While at the same time most of your executive orders would be considered high crimes and misdemeanors.

My advice to you would be to lay low, keep your mouth shut and just fade away.

You have one job opportunity awaiting you, that of jail-house lawyer and no you won’t need a license to practice there.



His legacy not including the Obama Phone

Many U.S. presidents, upon leaving office, try to fade from the national spotlight and live the rest of their lives as private citizens.



Continue reading

USA TODAY’s Editorial Board: Trump is ‘unfit for the presidency’

crew-2231211U.S.A. Today is a news paper with a different marketing plan.


It can be found on the floor next to your room at most any hotel visited by the “Road Warriors,” A.K., “Business Travelers.”

Those who actually subscribe to it are of no consequence. (Source)

The paper makes it a point to hide the political bias of the members of its editorial board. (Source)

And why not, how many U.S. papers are not leftward leaning and would like Mr. Trump.


We haven’t made a voting recommendation in 34 years. For this election, we made an exception.

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race.

Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them.

Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years.


We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

Whether through indifference or ignorance,

Trump has betrayed fundamental commitments made by all presidents since the end of World War II.

These commitments include unwavering support for NATO allies, steadfast opposition to Russian aggression, and the absolute certainty that the United States will make good on its debts.

He has expressed troubling admiration for authoritarian leaders and scant regard for constitutional protections.

We’ve been highly critical of the GOP nominee in a number of previous editorials.

With early voting already underway in several states and polls showing a close race, now is the time to spell out, in one place, the reasons Trump should not be president:

He is erratic. Trump has been on so many sides of so many issues that attempting to assess his policy positions is like shooting at a moving target.

A list prepared by NBC details 124 shifts by Trump on 20 major issues since shortly before he entered the race.

He simply spouts slogans and outcomes (he’d replace Obamacare with “something terrific”) without any credible explanations of how he’d achieve them.

He is ill-equipped to be commander-in-chief. Trump’s foreign policy pronouncements typically range from uninformed to incoherent.

It’s not just Democrats who say this. Scores of Republican national security leaders have signed an extraordinary open letter calling Trump’s foreign policy vision “wildly inconsistent and unmoored in principle.”


See entire article below.


Continue reading

The VA Does the Unthinkable: Deceased Veterans Left Unclaimed and Decomposing Without Burial

crew-2231211New Veterans Administration Mission Statement: “We don’t want to deal with you when you are alive or dead.”


As you read the article below, remember it is discussion on hospital in the VA System in Hines, Illinois.




Remember also, this isn’t politics as usual but usual politics.

The place that little gets done unless some one blows the whistle.

Few people get to pick their time and place of death.

It’s safe to say that dying in a Veterans Administration Hospital would be an exceptionally bad way to go.

If they can’t take care of veterans while they are alive it is certainly in the realm of possibility that they are left alone to dies with no none attending to them.

It’s time to destroy the entire VA system, Veterans deserve the best medical care available provided in the private sector.


The Silent Soldier

Troops paying their final respects. (Photo: Public Domain)

Troops paying their final respects. (Photo: Public Domain)

Veteran’s Affairs hospitals have been in the spot light for unacceptable wait times, Hot-Line issues, and below standard care. For the VA hospital in Illinois, however, a new low has been reached.Illinois VA hospital, Hines, already under fire for cockroaches and black mold in their kitchen, is now on the hot seat for “the bodies of dead patients left unclaimed in the morgue for up to two months without proper burial, whistle -blower documents allege,” according to Fox News.

It was uncovered that thought the VA facility indeed had the funds available to provide deceased veterans proper burials but simply chose not to.

Mark Kirk, U.S. Senator from Illinois, complained about the situation to the VA secretary and even went so far as to present new legislation to prevent this from happening.

Kirk stated, “The VA should be sickened and embarrassed by yet another exposed case of corruption and mistreatment of our veterans at Hines. “I have personally called Secretary McDonald and asked him to fire Christopher Wirtjes, the Chief responsible for this shameful treatment of our veterans’ remains.

Bureaucrats at Hines should spend as much time helping veterans as they do covering up neglect and abuse.”

Wirtjes was responsible for instructing staff to manipulate wait times last year and though he was not fired he was put on administrative leave.

The whistleblower painted a very grim picture of the Hines VA stating, “Some veteran’s remains have been left in our hospital morgue for 45 days or more until they are stacked to capacity at times.”

Alissa McCurley, Kirk’s deputy chief of staff, described a horrific situation of at least one body having been there so long that it literally liquefied and the “bag burst when staff had attempted to move.”

This type of gross neglect is unconscionable at best and goes against the moral fabric of this great nation. Kirk’s demand of Wirtjes firing comes a little too late.

On three separate occasions Wirtjes had been approached about permission to bury the unclaimed bodies and each time he refused.

A spokesman for the hospital, Rick Fox, stated that the allegations were a farce and that Wirtjes was and is following all laws regarding disposal of bodies.

Fox stated: “We take whistle blower allegations very seriously and absolutely agree that all of our veterans deserve dignity and respect, in life and in death. While our investigation into this matter is still ongoing, we have found allegations related to consistent problems with dignified and timely burials to be unsubstantiated. However, we have taken this opportunity to review our policies and procedures and are currently working to improve them.”

The Inspector General’s office stated, “”The OIG doesn’t confirm or deny the existence of any ongoing investigations.”



Continue reading

Exposed: FBI Director James Comey’s Clinton Foundation Connection

crew-2231211“No one is above the law.”

And we are to believe that?

The Clinton’s made an entire political career of avoiding prosecution doing whatever it took to get the job done.

Now we learn just how much money passed through his hands as well as his brother’s.




Will this be the end of Hillary Clinton?

It doesn’t seem there is time to put together a case.

She can be indicted however, and that won’t be such a great deal for her as she continues to push her fraud riddled case while still running for office.

Better yet his brother’s firm performed “an independent” audit of the Clinton Foundation in November.

James Comey received millions of dollars from the corrupt Clinton Foundation, and his brother’s law firm also does the Clinton’s taxes.


Likely never said out loud by Comey, but it would have to be on him mind.

It’s surprising he hasn’t already disappeared, with the exception that would add more fuel to the fire of Clinton’s numerous criminal dealings!


H/T Bunkersville.

According to a letter sent by 200 Republicans who stated Clinton “clearly placed our nation’s secrets in peril,” Comey was asked why he would not bring charges against her.

In the report, Comey is noted as receiving $6 million in one year along from Lockheed Martin, who is a Clinton Foundation donor, and became a donor in the same year Comey received those funds.


Additionally, Mr. Comey became a board member, a director, and a Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member of the London bank HSBC Holdings in 2013.

HSBC has also partnered with The Clinton Foundation, where records indicate that the bank projected $1 billion in financing through the Clinton Foundation for “retrofitting” 1,500 to 2,000 housing units to conserve energy.

Additionally, Peter Comey, James’ brother, serves as “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” for DLA Piper, according to the report.

DLA Piper is number five on Hillary Clinton’s all-time career Top Contributors list. DLA also performed an independent audit of The Clinton Foundation in November.

H/T:Washington Standard and for more on the fellow Comey see my earlier post:

FBI James Comey, the ultimate chameleon who sold his soul? 

He voted for Carter in 1980, but in ’84, Comey: “I voted for Reagan—I’d moved from Communist to whatever I am now. I’m not even sure how to characterize myself politically. Maybe at some point, I’ll have to figure it out.”

“I had no sense whether Jim was an R or a D,” says Eric Holder Jr., who worked closely with Comey when Holder was deputy attorney general to Janet Reno in the Clinton administration—and who remains a confirmed D.

 September 30, 2016


WASHINGTON, D.C. — A review of FBI Director James Comey’s professional history and relationships shows that the Obama cabinet leader — now under fire for his handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton — is deeply entrenched in the big-money cronyism culture of Washington, D.C..
His personal and professional relationships — all undisclosed as he announced the Bureau would not prosecute Clinton — reinforce bipartisan concerns that he may have politicized the criminal probe.

These concerns focus on millions of dollars that Comey accepted from a Clinton Foundation defense contractor, Comey’s former membership on a Clinton Foundation corporate partner’s board, and his surprising financial relationship with his brother Peter Comey, who works at the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.

Lockheed Martin

When President Obama nominated Comey to become FBI director in 2013, Comey promised the United States Senate that he would recuse himself on all cases involving former employers.

But Comey earned $6 million in one year alone from Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin became a Clinton Foundation donor that very year.

Comey served as deputy attorney general under John Ashcroft for two years of the Bush administration.

When he left the Bush administration, he went directly to Lockheed Martin and became vice president, acting as a general counsel.

How much money did James Comey make from Lockheed Martin in his last year with the company, which he left in 2010? More than $6 million in compensation.

Lockheed Martin is a Clinton Foundation donor.

The company admitted to becoming a Clinton Global Initiative member in 2010.

According to records, Lockheed Martin is also a member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt, which paid Bill Clinton $250,000 to deliver a speech in 2010.

In 2010, Lockheed Martin won 17 approvals for private contracts from the Hillary Clinton State Department.

HSBC Holdings

In 2013, Comey became a board member, a director, and a Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member of the London bank HSBC Holdings.

“Mr. Comey’s appointment will be for an initial three-year term which, subject to re-election by shareholders, will expire at the conclusion of the 2016 Annual General Meeting,” according to HSBC company records.

HSBC Holdings and its various philanthropic branches routinely partner with the Clinton Foundation. For instance, HSBC Holdings has partnered with Deutsche Bank through the Clinton Foundation to “retrofit 1,500 to 2,500 housing units, primarily in the low- to moderate-income sector” in “New York City.”

“Retrofitting” refers to a Green initiative to conserve energy in commercial housing units. Clinton Foundation records show that the Foundation projected “$1 billion in financing” for this Green initiative to conserve people’s energy in low-income housing units.

Who Is Peter Comey?

When our source called the Chinatown offices of D.C. law firm DLA Piper and asked for “Peter Comey,” a receptionist immediately put him through to Comey’s direct line. But Peter Comey is not featured on the DLA Piper website.

Peter Comey serves as “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” for DLA Piper. James Comey was not questioned about his relationship with Peter Comey in his confirmation hearing.

DLA Piper is the firm that performed the independent audit of the Clinton Foundation in November during Clinton-World’s first big push to put the email scandal behind them. DLA Piper’s employees taken as a whole represent a major Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign donation bloc and Clinton Foundation donation base.

DLA Piper ranks #5 on Hillary Clinton’s all-time career Top Contributors list, just ahead of Goldman Sachs.


See the entire article below.


Continue reading

EXCLUSIVE: Linda Tripp Reopens Vince Foster, Filegate, Travelgate, Whitewater Scandals

crew-2231211Linda Tripp had always appeared to me to be some what of a behind the scenes operator who put herself in the position of knowing too much and not keeping quiet about it.

Of course the links below represent stories and opinion pieces, but one question needs answering.

If anything, Ms. Tripp’s most recent allegations are certain to turn the Clinton warm room into to warp speed as they try that Linda Tripp’s testimony and statements are fraught with lies.

That coming from the team who will try to sell us this nonsense as they represent the biggest known liar in United States History.


How did Linda Trip not end up in once of the numerous body bags.
She must have written a letter discussing what she knew and saw first hand, had it  notarized and distributed to important friends who would release it in the event of an untimely death. 
1fosterIn any event she has placed herself in a high-speed controversy for God knows what reason that may likely end with here being examined on a coroners stainless steel table.
Several examples follow:
NEW YORK — As a White House staffer who worked directly adjacent to Hillary Clinton’s second floor West Wing office, Linda Tripp was afforded a front row seat to some of the most infamous scandals to rock the Bill Clinton White House.

Tripp possesses insider information on the scandals known as Travelgate, Filegate and Whitewater, and she personally witnessed the handling of documents from Vince Foster’s office the morning after the Deputy White House Counsel was found dead in an apparent suicide.

Foster was heavily involved in defending the Clinton’s in the Travelgate, Filegate and Whitewater cases.

Tripp was the last person known to have spoken to Foster before his death.

In an exclusive interview, Tripp reopened each of those scandals – Travelgate, Filegate, Whitewater and the issues surrounding Vince Foster’s death – and she used her unique vantage point to explain how the notorious cases foreshadowed many of the current Clinton controversies, from the Clinton Foundation to Hillary Clinton’s private email server troubles.

Tripp spoke in an hour-long interview set to air in full on this reporter’s Sunday night talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and NewsTalk 990 AM in Philadelphia.

Tripp is well-known for her role in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, documenting evidence of the young intern’s relationship with Bill Clinton and submitting the documentation to independent counsel Kenneth Starr, leading to the public disclosure of the affair.

However, many people may be surprised to learn of Tripp’s larger role in the West Wing, and her firsthand experiences behind the curtain of the Clinton scandal machine.

 See the entire article below.

Continue reading

U.S. to Send 600 More Troops to Iraq to Help Retake Mosul From ISIS

crew-2231211Hello White House Switch Board, put me through to Obama.


President Obama’s office this is Shauntay,  White House intern, how can I help you.

“I want to speak to Obama,”

76699“I’m sorry he’s out playing golf at the moment.

“Put me through to his cell phone.”

“On no sir he can’t be disturbed when he is golfing it messes up his came.

“Can you please give him this message?”

“Yes sir and that would be?”

We don’t want no more of your stinking war in Iraq and Afghanistan.”




American and British soldiers at the Besmaya base southeast of Baghdad in January. Credit Ahmad Al-Rubaye/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

WASHINGTON — President Obama has authorized sending an additional 600 American troops to Iraq to assist Iraqi forces in the looming battle to take back the city of Mosul from the Islamic State, United States officials said on Wednesday.

The announcement means that there will soon be 5,000 American troops in Iraq, seven years after the Obama administration withdrew all American troops from the country. Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, has criticized both Mr. Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, for that decision.

Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter, traveling in New Mexico, said the additional troops would help with logistics as well as providing intelligence for Iraqi security forces in the fight for Mosul.

Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last week that Iraqi forces would be ready to retake the city by early October.

“These are military forces that will be deployed to intensify the strategy that’s in place, to support Iraqi forces as they prepare for an offensive,” Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, said Wednesday.

Administration officials insisted that the deployment was consistent with Mr. Obama’s policy not to commit American ground forces again in Iraq.

Mr. Obama, who vowed to end the Iraq war in his 2008 presidential campaign, has been wary of increasing the number of American troops there.

The officials said the Americans would be there to help Iraqi and Kurdish forces, who they said were leading the operations to retake the Islamic State’s remaining territory.


Mrs. Clinton said at an NBC News forum on national security this month that she would not put ground troops in Iraq “ever again.” Mr. Trump said in March that he would deploy up to 30,000 American troops in the Middle East to defeat the Islamic State.


Continue reading

Overruled: Congress Soundly Rejects Obama’s Veto of 9/11 Bill

crew-2231211Finally the members of congress of the United States has finally risen up to show they still have circulating hormones pulsating their veins.


Typically members of the left and the Congressional Black Caucus supported Obama with another executive order that need to be over ridden.

200For her part, Nancy Pelosi who was recently transferred to a V.A. Mental health facility could not remember how she voted.

Perhaps she was heavily sedated at the time of my call?


It’s high time that someone slap some white upside this big eared posers head to leave him with some common sense.

Members of the Republican held House and Senate must veto any proposals Obama puts forward.

It’s not  the role of the Executive Branch of our government, to put legislation into play, that role is reserved for the members of the House of Representatives.  (Source)

The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, continue to cast a long shadow over American politics, and have now led to the first congressional override of a veto signed by President Barack Obama.



After a series of impassioned floor speeches Wednesday morning, both the U.S. Senate and House acted with sweeping bipartisan comity, rejecting the president’s opposition to a bill that allows the families of American victims of the 9/11 attacks to sue the government of Saudi Arabia.

The months-long debate over the bill split some longtime national security alliances in surprising ways. GOP Sen. John McCain was a vocal supporter of the bill, while his fellow Republican and usually reliable partner on such issues, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, argued against it.

The Senate voted 97-1, and the House, 348 to 77.

Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) joined Graham in a failed effort to tweak the legislation and make it harder not only for families to pursue lawsuits, but also for the U.S. to be sued by foreigners in the future.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading