I didn’t make this up: The U.N. has declared war on women with great looking hooters

By Jim Campbell.

June 27, 2017


Once again the United Nations has proved to be the gang that can’t shoot straight.

Made up for the most part by despots and dictators in the Middle East, it’s about time they are introduced to real women or move on down the line.

They can take their cultural appropriation nonsense and pound it hard where the sun doesn’t shine.

It’s Time to tell the United Nations to move elsewhere!

UN Mission Statement:

They do absolutely nothing well.



They’re like a crazy aunt living in the attic.

Downtrend The United Nations is on a roll.

Recently they announced their efforts to make cultural appropriation illegal and now they want to ban titties in advertising.

A UN group is aiming to ban any sexy ads that that reinforce negative stereotypes of women.

What that means is anyone’s guess, but clearly, the UN has their priorities straight because there are no more pressing issues than scantily-clad women in burger chain commercials.

The Unstereotype Alliance is part of the UN Women’s Group and their mission is “to banish stereotypical portrayals of gender in advertising and all brand led content.”


Oh Oh, the Saudi’s are not that hot on female drivers.  Danaca would blow their minds.


 This is a serious thing, or actually, it’s something that lunatics take seriously.

According to their mission statement, they will “tackle the widespread prevalence of stereotypes that are often perpetuated through advertising.”

How exactly they plan on tackling this made up issue remains a mystery, but apparently tackling is a big part of the solution.

The UN is a ridiculous organization and this new initiative is all the proof you need.

There are places where women do not have equal rights.

There are countries where women are abused and murdered. A Carl’s Jr. ad doesn’t make Muslims mutilate the genitals of little girls.

A Go Daddy commercial with below-average Danica Patrick isn’t why women are stoned to death because that’s what passes for divorce proceedings in certain places.

There are places where women do not have equal rights.

There are countries where women are abused and murdered.

A Carl’s Jr. ad doesn’t make Muslims mutilate the genitals of little girls.

A Go Daddy commercial with Danica Patrick isn’t why women are stoned to death because that’s what passes for divorce proceedings in certain places.

If the UN really wants to help some worldwide, why not go after  the mostly Islamic countries where women are teated like property?

A Carl’s Jr. ad doesn’t make Muslims mutilate the genitals of little girls.


Good thing none of this is binding on the U.S.




Verified: Nothing is free

By Jim Campbell

June 27, 2017


Readers at this site have no problem understanding that pure socialism is a failed economic system.

Sources immediately below verify what the young school teacher is telling us is true.

Leave it to the young school teacher to explain it to us. 




This teacher from Denmark puts every single Bernie Sanders supporter to shame with this epic truth bomb about the reality of socialism.

Please read her omments all the way to the bottom!

Perhaps if Bernie Sander’s wife doesn’t end up in prison for multiple financial frauds, they can choose between Denmark and Russia as their future abodes.

It appears Bernie Sanders should really stop worrying about what others are doing with their lives and focus more on what his own spouse is doing.

But that wouldn’t be the socialist way, now would it?

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is investigating Jane Sanders, of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, over her seemingly shady role in the fraudulent acquisition of nearly $7 million in tax-exempt bonds when she was the president of Burlington College. (Source).


Feel the Burn !



Continue reading

Why Supreme Court’s Travel Ban Loophole Threatens Liberal Academia

Why bring the Mountain to Mohammed when you can bring Mohammed to the American University that’s waiting for him with open arms?


Mr. Saul Alinsky, meet Mohammed.

American University for Muslims, U of Michigan


Come on already, the Trump Administration’s Travel Ban was to originally last a whopping six weeks.

Until the entire Muslim community, in the United States represents, 3.3 million Muslims of all ages or about 1 percent of the total U.S. population, the Pew Research Center reports. The figure is an update to Pew’s 2011 estimate of 2.75 million Muslims living in the United States.

Since the number seems up for grabs, let’s ban them all until they renounce Sharia law as it pertains to homosexuality, marriage, female genital mutilation, infidelity, praying in our streets. 

If the don’t like it send them back to their country of historical origin.

Since that is not going to happen is that, “Now boarding Baghdad Air Lines I’m now hearing?

The problem was that people seeking refuge status came from three Muslim Countries, Yemen, Syria, and Somalia with no functioning government to assure those wanting to come to the U.S. had been properly vetted.

Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it tell us that the federal government must admit anyone, no matter their race color and creed.


The Islamic American University Above at the University of Michigan.


Susan Swift,

June 27, 2017


In the wake of the Supreme Court‘s ruling partially reinstating Trump’s travel ban until its full review in October,  the high court created a potential loophole:

 A credible claim of a bona fide relationship to the United States can defeat the Government’s compelling need for national security.  

The Supreme Court cautioned that someone who enters into a relationship simply to avoid the travel ban would not qualify:  “For example, a nonprofit group devoted to immigration issues may not contact foreign nationals from the designated countries, add them to client lists, and then secure their entry by claiming injury from their exclusion.”

 (Ok, you nonprofits, you’ve been warned, so listen up on how to do it right.)

So who has a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States that would give rise to protection from the travel ban?

  • A foreign national with a “close familial relationship” such as a spouse or mother-in-law;
  • “students from the designated countries who have been admitted to (an American university”)
  • “a worker who accepted an offer of employment from an American company”;
  • “a lecturer invited to address an American audience”;
  • “[a]s for entities, the relationship must be formal, documented, and formed in the ordinary course, rather than for the purpose of evading [the ban].”


See entire article below.


Continue reading

Anti-Trump Leak Campaign Damaging U.S. and Allied Operations

This article covers one of the most problematic issues the Trump Administration faces.


The bitter losers in government jobs from which they, for the most part, can’t be fired will continue to do so as they are still incapable of dealing with the ass kicking laid upon Hillary Clinton.

There are far too many of them to covertly investigate, but it’s worth doing so.

Hang a few of these treasonous bastards out to dry with some serious jail time and that cold conceivable have a chilling effect on further activities of those wanting to destroy Trump and the country at the same time.

Of course, he will still have to deal with the Congressional Obstructionists below.



The Washington Free Beacon


BY: Adam Kredo

June 27, 2017

A new wave of leaks targeting the Trump administration has actively endangered ongoing intelligence and military operations being conducted by the United States and its allies, sparking anger and concern inside and outside the White House, according to multiple conversations with senior U.S. officials intimately familiar with the situation.

The classified leaks, which are being handed to sympathetic journalists by former Obama administration officials who left the government and by holdovers still serving in the Trump administration, have damaged a number of ongoing operations, ranging from American efforts to prevent Russian infiltration of the United States to Israeli efforts against ISIS, sources said.


A recent Washington Post story disclosed classified secrets as part of a larger story about Obama administration cyber efforts against Russia. It was published days after a New York Times story, which revealed details of a secret Israeli cyber operation that Trump is said to have leaked to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

The sensitivity of the material being leaked has heightened criticism both of the former Obama officials who are suspected of unveiling these secrets and of the Trump administration for its seeming inability to stem the disclosures, according to these officialAnger is running so high that multiple current U.S. officials have named some of the former Obama officials they believe are behind the unauthorized disclosures, which Trump officials say are aimed at kneecapping the current administration and also rewriting the record of the Obama years.

Anger is running so high that multiple current U.S. officials have named some of the former Obama officials they believe are behind the unauthorized disclosures, which Trump officials say are aimed at kneecapping the current administration and also rewriting the record of the Obama years.

“They [former Obama officials] offer ridiculous explanations about why Obama couldn’t act more forcefully, and then they apparently leak even more information about certain U.S. measures they claim have been taken against Russia,” said one senior U.S. official who deals closely with the matter.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading

Is the “crime of the century” bad journalism?

With all the criminal behavior that was never brought to justice concerning the malfeasance of Obama and Hillary while they were attempting to destroy America, this doesn’t come close.


That being said it certainly deserves honorable mention.


H/T SocialismisnottheAnswer


Renew America


By Cliff Kincaid


The latest propaganda piece from the Washington Post, Obama’s secret struggle to punish Russia for Putin’s election assault,” is based, as usual, mostly on anonymous sources determined to make former President Barack Obama look good.

The gist is that Obama tried his best to punish Russia for alleged interference in the 2016 election, but he fell short and left the matter in the hands of President Donald Trump, who has done nothing.

So Trump is blamed for Obama’s failure.

How convenient.


The essence of the piece is that “intelligence” was “captured” that somehow proved that Russian President Vladimir Putin gave “specific instructions” that he wanted to “defeat or at least damage the Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, and help elect her opponent, Donald Trump.”

This, of course, happened, with no effect on the outcome of the election. (Source)

According to non-other than the bastion of progressivism, the New York Times.

This “intelligence” may be what the Post seeks to expose – Russian “active measures” or disinformation.



As we reported back in January, “Looking at the election objectively, it is possible to say that Russian leader Vladimir Putin may have had a personal vendetta against the former U.S. secretary of state for some reason, stemming from allegations of U.S. meddling in Russian internal affairs.

On the other hand, Putin may have preferred that Clinton become the U.S. president because her failed Russian ‘reset’ had facilitated Russian military intervention in Ukraine and Syria, and he believed he could continue to take advantage of her.”

This makes far more sense than the Post story.

Remember that Obama won the 2012 election after dismissing his Republican opponent Mitt Romney’s claim that Russia was a geopolitical threat to the United States

. Obama had also been caught on an open mic before the election promising to be “flexible” in changing his positions to benefit Russia.

“These comments provide more evidence that Obama was never the anti-Russian figure he postured as in the final days of his second term,” we noted.

The Post story by Greg Miller and others is an obvious response to the observation that, if Obama thought the Russian interference was such a big deal, what did Obama try to do about it?


See the entire article below. (Of course, the Washington Post is not credible)


Continue reading

Three journalists leaving Communist News Network after retracted article

Can it be true if provided to us by the major provider of fake news?


Of course, we would not want to leave the Washington Post or the New York times out of the running.

This has gone far beyond journalistic integrity of which they have not an inclining.

This is no longer a matter of free speech.

Legislation must be implemented covering fake news that affects national policy, holding the purveyors accountable with stiff fines, and or jail time.

This will absolutely receive a 10+ rating by the Trial Lawyers Association who are every bit as woeful as the journalists they will defend.

Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted.

Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN.

“In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignations of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” a spokesman said Monday evening.

An internal investigation by CNN management found that some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published, people briefed on the results of the investigation said.


James O’Keffe of Project Veritas has CNN producer admitting the Russian Story is Bullshit!


The story, which reported that Congress was investigating a “Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials,” cited a single anonymous source.

These types of stories are typically reviewed by several departments within CNN, including fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers — before publication.


This breakdown in editorial workflow disturbed the CNN executives who learned about it.

In a staff meeting Monday afternoon, investigative unit members were told that the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong.

Rather, it meant that “the story wasn’t solid enough to publish as-is,” one of the people briefed on the investigation said.

The reporting about the Russian investment fund and Trump officials was not relayed on CNN’s television channels, but it was published on the web and shared on social media.

On Friday, one of the people named in the story, Trump ally Anthony Scaramucci, disputed Frank’s reporting and said, “I did nothing wrong.”

Friday night, once it was determined that editorial processes were not followed, CNN deleted the story from CNN.com.

Soon thereafter, the story was officially retracted and replaced with an editor’s note.

The piece “did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted,” the note said. “Links to the story have been disabled.”

The editor’s note also included an apology to Scaramucci.

“CNN did the right thing. Classy move.

Apology accepted,” Scaramucci tweeted the next morning.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading

The annual Ramadan ‘Iftar’ dinner for Muslims at the White House isn’t the only thing the Trump Administration has axed

Sadly most American taxpayers know Obama was deeply entrenched within the Muslim Community but nowhere to this extent.


The only just treatment for Obama will be to ship his bony ass back to Kenya after the 5-year confinement at the Obama Library finally prove he was not born here.

Administration officials also have eliminated plans to use millions of hard-earned taxpayer dollars to fund Islamic organizations and alleged Muslim charities allied with former President Barack Obama, including anti-American Muslim individuals like sharia-proponent Linda Sarsour.

Also eliminated are Muslim government employees from the Obama team who were linked to these nefarious Islamic organizations.



Neil Munro

June 27, 2017

The turnaround was made public on Friday when the Department of Homeland Security announced a revised list of the organizations which are getting DHS funds to help prevent young Muslims from becoming jihadis. The new list replaced an Obama list announced January 13, 2017, and it dropped a $800,000 grant for an Islamic seminary in Los Angeles, and a $393,000 grant for a linked organization, the Muslim Public Affairs Council Foundation.

The foundation is a spin-off of the D.C.-based Muslim Public Affairs Council (below), whose leaders were frequent advisors to Obama and his deputies, where they lobbied for a national strategy of letting semi-segregated Islamic political communities and groups — but not the FBI — play the leading role in combating Islamic terrorism.

Kelly explained his new pro-integration strategy in a June 22 event held in Congress, where he acknowledged that Islamic terrorists are acting for sincere religious reasons, saying:

They are out there doing what they think is their religion and think [it is] what they are supposed to be doing … What I’ve elected to do is take what little money I have in this regard and give it to what I consider to be the time-proven things — law enforcement from an outreach point of view and communities developing relationships … so that there’s an open line of communication so they know if they see this [advocacy or preparation for violence] happening in the home or they see it happening — that is to say, the move towards radicalism — or they see it happening in the churches or mosques, they know to call someone before that person typically crosses the line.

The departments June 23 statement emphasized that funding will be given to groups that cooperate with law enforcement:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will award 26 grants — totaling $10 million for two years of programming — to organizations that will work to improve the security of our communities and prevent terrorism. Grantees were selected in part because of their potential to support law enforcement and other frontline defenders, to demonstrate programmatic effectiveness, and to use taxpayer resources efficiently to create independently sustainable programs. Grants were approved for local law enforcement agencies, state and local government agencies, universities, and non-profit organizations.

UNDER OBAMA, the Department of Health and Human Services has provided a U.S. taxpayer-funded $270,000 grant to Islamic Relief Worldwide, a charity that has repeatedly been linked to terrorism financing and support for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, according to recent grant information.

Kelly’s new funding list eliminated grants to several additional organizations, including $400,000 for Life After Hate Inc., $499,998 for the Somali-focused Ka Joog organization in Minneapolis, $40,000 for the Muslim American Leadership Alliance, and $396,585 for Unity Productions Foundation, whose lawyer in Mazen Asbahi.

In turn, Kelly shifted the money to the Global Peace Foundation in New Jersey, and to Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office in Minneapolis, and the Heartland Democracy Center in Minneapolis, where many local Somalis have preserved strong ties to Islamic armed groups in their homeland.

The funding cut-off came one day before the final day of the 2017 Ramadan season.

In prior years, Obama invited Muslim ambassadors and U.S.-based Muslim allies to share a fast-breaking “Iftar dinner” at the White House.

At Obama’s final 2016 Iftar, the attendees chanted “Four More Years!”

Trump’s officials did not explain why President Donald Trump choose to not hold an annual Iftar dinner this year.

A  likely reason is that officials did not want to invite some of the Islamic advocates who worked with Obama’s deputies. For examples, the invitees to Obama’s Iftar dinners included the president of MPAC, Salam Al-Marayati, whose grant was cut June 23.

Another frequent Obama guest was Mohamed Magid, a Sudanese cleric who heads the All Dulles Area Muslim Society mosque in Northern Virginia.

Magid is a former president of the Islamic Society of North America and was invited to shape anti-terrorism policy at the FBI and DHS.

Both Al-Marayati and Magid have pushed so many Islamist claims that Obama’s deputies even tried to conceal their organizations’ presence at the 2011 Iftar dinner.

People like Mohamed Elibiary no longer work in Homeland Security:

During his eight years in office, Obama never invited Islamic reformers, such as Zuhdi Jasser, president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, a pro-Western Muslim group, to his Iftar dinners.

In response to Kelly’s shut-out from the grants, MPAC issued a protest in which it frankly admitted that it seeks to exclude the FBI from Islamic societies in the United States, such as mosques and affiliated community centers, or neighborhoods with a large Islamic population.

The MPAC strategy of excluding law-enforcement from Muslim civic groups reflects a broader effort by Islamic advocates to create and expand segregated Islamic neighborhoods throughout the United States, each of which is to be ruled by Islamic laws, in partial cooperation with federal and state law enforcement.

Continue reading