Watergate Reporter’s Corpse Warns of ‘Cold Civil War’

By Jim Campbell

July 17. 2016


Has Carl Bernstein had anything useful to say since his fine work on Watergate which led to the resignation of President Nixon, or is he just another rotting corpse shilling and pimping for C.N.N. ?

Uber-leftist, Carl Bernstein has been dead for well over a decade, nobody has bothered to tell him.

CNN keeps running his tapes and musings wanting us to still believe his corpse is functional.


In the video below, tongue in cheek, President Trump, sets the record straight. 

Now a cranky old man, the 73-year-old has a regular gig at CNN where he can pretend that the ongoing witch hunt against President Donald Trump is the equivalent of Watergate.

By doing so, it is a way for Bernstein to sip from the fountain of youth but more often, he just looks like a pathetic codger who is desperately trying to relive the glory days.

His latest scoop?

Those Americans who don’t take the word of CNN fake news weasels as if it were spoken from the mouth of God himself are living in an alternate reality and it’s all the fault of Fox News.

Bernstein needs some serious psychiatric treatment, immediately.

Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein continues to milk his fame from being one of the reporters on the Watergate scandal that ran Richard Nixon out of office.

Oh, and the country is already in the midst of what he calls a “cold civil war,” a point that may be at least somewhat accurate but that war has been initiated by CNN and the left who are unable to process losing an election.

According to the Washington Examiner “Carl Bernstein: ‘Cold civil war’ gripping US as media embrace ‘different truths’”:

Carl Bernstein depicted the contentious nature of politics as being in the middle of a “cold civil war” as President Trump pushes back against what he calls “fake news” and various news outlets are perceived as espousing different “truths.”

Appearing on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” on Sunday, alongside Leonard Downie, former executive editor and vice president of the Washington Post, Bernstein compared the current media climate to that of the Watergate era.

He stressed the importance of anonymous sources and said “quote ‘leaks’ which really are not leaks” are instead “mostly reporters trying very hard to get truthful information and put some context to this story.”

Bernstein said one of the big difference between Watergate and now is “that we are in the midst of a cold civil war in this country.”

He expanded on that idea, saying that there is a political and cultural civil war and all of our reporting is taking place in the context of that cold civil war. And nothing quite like that existed at the time of Watergate.”



Part of the “cold civil war,” Berstein added, can be pinned on the “configuration of media with Fox News, with CNN being perceived by different sets of viewers as representing different truths.”

Singling out Fox News, he said the right-leaning cable news channel has “changed American politics as perhaps no other institution has.”

Not all of his critique focused solely on specific networks, but on cable news in general, which he described as a “hothouse of political debate in which fact-base debate is becoming impossible in this culture.”


But the press has indeed changed since the dashing young newsman reached the heights of fame and was even played by a young Dustin Hoffman in the Academy Award winning film “All the President’s Men” way back in 1976.

It’s a totally different country now and not in a good way.

Like Bob Woodward, Bernstein has become the same type of establishment political hack that he once damned. 

Mr. Bernstein is a flaming leftist and dyed in the wool Trump hater who fits in perfectly at CNN.




Continue reading

The difference between the Green Berets and the U.S. Navy Seals

By Jim Campbell

July 13, 2017


The video below is just one minute long and shows a technique taught in Krav Maga, the Israeli Defense Forces hand to hand combat system used by a U.S. Army Green Beret.

Although Green Berets and Navy SEALs are both part of special operations forces trained for reconnaissance, fighting terrorism, unconventional warfare and combat search and rescue.

The Green Berets are also trained in peacekeeping, diplomacy, counter-drug operations and providing humanitarian assistance.

The Green Berets were established in 1952 as the U.S. Army Special Forces, while the SEALS were officially formed in 1962 as the special forces unit of the U.S. Navy. (Source)



What do Navy SEALs do?
What is the job description for a Navy Seal?
Many Green Berets have graduate and post-graduate degrees.

They first go through a 24-day selection process intended to weed out soldiers not qualified to undergo further training.

Besides combat skills, weapons, navigation, skydiving, scuba diving, survival, resistance and escape, they learn the geography, customs, culture, language, and traditions of a specific part of the world, and they are assigned to a special forces group within that area of operation.




Navy SEALS train for 30 months before they are ready for deployment.

Early in their conditioning training, they undergo a physically grueling ordeal called Hell Week.

Later training includes special warfare, underwater demolition, a parachute jump and SEAL qualification training courses.

Only a small percentage of candidates manage to complete training and become Navy SEALS.

After training, SEALs are stationed with teams in California, Virginia or Hawaii, and can be deployed to any part of the world.



Continue reading

Pressuring North Korea

If the fat young little dog eater doesn’t get his act together and keeps messing with a missile program that could eventually deliver nuclear missiles to the U.S. then that puts President Trump in a serious dilemma.


Unlike the Democrat Bill Clinton, who chose to kick the can down the road rather than dealing with it decisively, predictably he did nothing and left it to future administrations to do his work.


How could his word have ever been trusted after he was impeached then looked us in the eye on television that he did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinski.

Like his wife, Bill Clinton has always been a pathological liar.

Unless pudge ball comes up with a better strategy like feeding his people, another Republican Admisistration will be left to clean up the mess left to them by Democrats.




The Weekly Standard

 A jubilant Kim Jong-un, in a photo released July 5. Photo credit: Newscom

The response was typical Trumpism—with a soupçon of Mean Girls. Just as he had called jihadists “losers” a few weeks prior, the president reacted to North Korea’s test launch of a midrange ballistic missile on July 3 with a gibe that cut to the quick. “

Does [Kim Jong-un] have anything better to do with his life?” he mused on Twitter.

President Trump has a point.

Even though North Korea’s economy has shown a slight pulse in recent years, thanks to the growth of unofficial markets and various cronyist enterprises for well-connected elites, like mining operations, the country remains in dire straits.

Outside of Pyongyang, food shortages remain a serious problem. Kim quite literally does have something better to do: improve the lives of his people, rather than divert massive sums towards the military and his nuclear and missile programs.

On the other hand, the Kims have been quite canny.

Some time ago, they made the strategic decision that the only way to ensure the survival of their regime was to become a bona fide nuclear state, capable of wreaking mass devastation on South Korea,

Japan, and the United States.

Pyongyang has already checked the first two off its list; now, with the launch of a missile that can apparently hit Alaska, it appears tantalizingly close to achieving its ultimate—and horrifying—aim.

Experts suggest that in just a year or two, North Korea will be able to launch a nuclear attack on the continental United States.

Of course, the North Koreans have had help in the form of nearly a quarter-century of feckless American policy.

The less said about the 1994 “Agreed Framework,” the better.


That deal, struck between the Clinton administration and the North Koreans, was supposed to stop the regime’s nuclear program in its tracks.

What it actually did was buy time for the Kims to continue down their primrose path—and illustrate the folly of pursuing “diplomacy” as an end unto itself.

American politicians often bemoan outsourcing to China.



Yet the last three presidential administrations have largely done just that when it comes to North Korea policy.

That’s not inherently idiotic: China, as North Korea’s largest trading partner by an order of magnitude, does have significant leverage over the small despotic state on its northeastern border.

China also supplies North Korea with the vast majority of its oil and gas.

(There is only a tiny amount of fossil fuels on the Korean peninsula.)

But what presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama failed to recognize is that we have leverage over China.

Either that or they were too timid to use it.

See the entire article below.


Continue reading

Voters unregister after Trump voter fraud panel demands information

Talk about a great way to restore some credibility to our election system.


Non-citizens are running for the hills Cal has at least 3 Million in LA.

This goes hand and hand with the illegal aliens hauling ass back to Mexico. (Source)



The Hill

Alicia Cohn

July 9th, 2017



Thousands of voters are responding to the possibility their information will be shared with President Trump’s election integrity panel by withdrawing their voter registration, according to a Friday report.

In Colorado, one of the states that is complying with part of the commission request, two clerks have seen a significant increase in voters withdrawing their voter registration, Denver’s ABC affiliate reported.

In Denver, one clerk has seen a 2,150 percent increase in people withdrawing as voters over the past since July 3 compared to the first non-holiday week before.

From a statistical standpoint, percentage increase means nothing, unless the number in the preceding year was provided for comparison purposes.


Migrants trek along a footpath leading to Sasabe, Mexico, from  the U.S. border south of Tucson.. (Don Bartletti / Los Angeles Times)

Colorado allows voters to withdraw online or make their information confidential by paying a fee.

WHAT? paying a fee?  Doesn’t that discriminate against the poor and the black voter who may not have the money to do so?

The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity last week requested all 50 states to upload publicly available voter information to a federal website.


The information requested, in a letter signed by Vice Chair Kris Kobach, includes voter names, birth dates, the last four digits of Social Security numbers and party affiliation.

Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams is releasing publicly available voter information including full name, address, party affiliation and date the person registered, phone number, gender identity, birth year and voting history.

The state will provide Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, full date of birth and email addresses.



Continue reading

The U.S. never signed the Paris Climate Accords: Obama put it in play using another illegal executive orders

We are so fortunate that President Trump, removed the Unites States from the Paris Climate Accords.


In order for the U.S. to agree to a binding treaty, it must have 2/3 yea votes from the United States Senate. (Source)

This of course never happened.

Article II, Section 2, Paragraph 2 orders that the President: …shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.


Once again Obama slipped another fastball by the United States taxpayers by doing his usual dancing in the dark.

List of countries that signed the accord. (Source)


Nations Approve Landmark Climate Accord in Paris


Obama Commends Climate Change Accord

LE BOURGET, France — With the sudden bang of a gavel Saturday night, representatives of 195 Nations reached a landmark accord that will, for the first time, commit nearly every country to lowering planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to help stave off the most drastic effects of climate change.

The deal, which was met with an eruption of cheers and ovations from thousands of delegates gathered from around the world, represents a historic breakthrough on an issue that has foiled decades of international efforts to address climate change.

Not worth listening to Barry below as his speech is filled with his usual lies.



Traditionally, such pacts have required developed economies like the United States to take action to lower greenhouse gas emissions, but they have exempted developing countries like China and India from such obligations.

The accord, which United Nations diplomats have worked toward for nine years, changes that dynamic by requiring action in some form from every country, rich or poor.

“This is truly a historic moment,” the United Nations secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, said in an interview. “For the first time, we have a truly universal agreement on climate change, one of the most crucial problems on earth.”


President Obama, who regards tackling climate change as a central element of his legacy, spoke of the deal in a televised address from the White House.

“This agreement sends a powerful signal that the world is fully committed to a low-carbon future,” he said.

“We’ve shown that the world has both the will and the ability to take on this challenge.”

See the entire article below.

Continue reading

Bernie Sanders: Capitalist Pig

Bernie Sanders Supporters have always been confused.


There is no economic system called socialism that functions anywhere in the world without capitalism making it possible.

Bernie has always understood this, he counted on his fans to be too ignorant to figure it out.


Wake up time fools, nothing is Free.

Got that?

Nothing is free.

If it seems so it is the result of redistributing wealth  from those who work for a living.

Want free college tuition?

Get a job or take out loans that’s what we did.


Front Page Magazine

Daniel Greenfield

June 28, 2016

Bernie Sanders is a complete and utter fraud.

Last year, Bernie joined the company of Vermont’s 1% and bought his third home.

The money that Bernie used his way to break the $1 million mark and buy his way into the 1% came from the $27 donors he touted during his campaign.

Other campaigns were funded by billionaires.
But the folks paying for Bernie’s private Delta 767 with its menu of herb crusted lamb loin, chocolate ganache, fine cheeses and white wine were ordinary people who would never be allowed to fly on it.
When Bernie Sanders first came to Vermont, he bought a shack with a dirt floor with unemployment money.


Bernie could live large on their donations, but he couldn’t directly pocket their money. Not unless he figured out how to sell them something of his own. And that’s how Bernie joined the 1%.

Our Revolution, Bernie’s book, which was also the name of his new organization, sold for $27.

According to Bernie, that was the average size of his donations.
The actual number was $86, but truth and Bernie have always had only the loosest of relationships.
And Bernie supporters were no longer giving $27 to subsidize a campaign, a cause, Bernie’s jet and his consultants, but his wallet and his summer home.

Bernie sold his supporters for $27 a head to a multinational corporation in exchange for $795,000.

His book is named after Our Revolution, a 501(c)(4) “social welfare” organization that he set up to influence elections and which can accept unlimited amounts of money from donors without disclosing them.

According to Our Revolution’s former organizing director, it was set up that way to “take big checks from billionaires.”

Bernie Sanders can’t legally be involved in running his own organization.

But he can cash in on a book which has the same name as that organization.
The distinctions are bound to be lost on his supporters just as they didn’t understand what it meant when Bernie didn’t cap the commissions of his consultants.

There’s nothing with making a lot of money.

Unless you’re Bernie, in which case you make money by insisting that it’s deeply immoral for other people to be making money.
Especially the evil 1 percent.

But that $1 million puts Bernie over the 1% in Vermont. Entry level for the 1% in Vermont is $299,259.

Bernie made three times more than the people he has denounced up and down the country.

Many of those dreaded 1 percenters are professionals who, unlike Bernie, work for a living, and also unlike him, don’t own three homes or fly private chartered jets around the world to meet the Pope.

Bernie made more than the $735,607 average 1% income in Vermont.

He didn’t just join the 1%. He joined the 0.5%. And he did it by monetizing his supporters.
When he tells them that he’s fighting for the little guy, he neglects to mention that he means only one little guy named Bernie.
See the entire article below.

Continue reading

World Taekwondo Federation Had To Change Its Name

This one is definately to be filed under you can’t make this stuff up.


What in the world could possibly be wrong with the acronym, W.T.F.?

Perhaps the politically correct Luddites who got their panties in a bunch on this one need to move along and S.T.F.U.

We don’t have that problem with Krav Maga, unless we were to become an association, as in, K.M.A.

Why We Can’t Have Nice Things!

The World Taekwondo Federation announced Friday it was rebranding itself as “World Taekwondo” because it is too pure for this dirty world.

For 44 years the group has been known as WTF, but that has obviously become, well, problematic.


World Taekwondo president Choue Chung-won and delegates pose for a photo before the 2017 World Taekwondo championships in South Korea



“In the digital age, the acronym of our federation has developed negative connotations unrelated to our organization and so it was important that we rebranded to better engage with our fans,” World Taekwondo (formerly WTF) President Choue Chung-won said in a statement.

 Unveiling a new “f**k”-free brand and logo, the sporting body said the change “reflects its commitment to evolving and adapting to remain relevant with today’s modern audiences.”


Continue reading