CIA, FBI launch manhunt for insider who handed top-secret documents to WikiLeaks

President Trumps, CIA Director, Mike Pompeo’s comments are patently absurd.

 

What evidence does he have for his assertions about Julian Assange its founder, in the video below?

Exposing the government’s illegal activities at any level is the true mark of a patriot.

I monument must be erected to laud the exposures of Edward Snowden, Julian Assange,and all whistleblowers.

After all, the government watches us, someone must watch them.

WikiLeaks called the series of leaks the ‘largest ever publication of confidential documents’ on the CIA.

Assange fired back at Pompeo’s comments saying the CIA is “trying to get ahead of the publicity curve and create a preemptive defense”.

 “For the head of the CIA to pronounce what the boundaries are, of reporting or not reporting — is a very disturbing precedent,” Assange said during an Intercepted podcast, speaking from the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he has resided since 2012.
 
“The head of the CIA determining who is a publisher, who’s not a publisher, who’s a journalist, who’s not a journalist, is totally out of line.
 

“So how does he propose to conduct this ending?

He didn’t say.

But the CIA is only in the business of collecting information, kidnapping people, and assassinating people.

 

So, it’s quite a menacing statement that he does need to clarify.”

 

The next world war will not be invisible

After the success of STUXNET, a virus written by the United States to destroy Iranian uranium enrichment facilities, the U.S. government could no longer deny it was developing cyber weapons meant to do physical damage.

With US companies and agencies under constant attack from state-sponsored Chinese hackers, it is only a matter of time before tensions boil over and more sensitive infrastructure is targeted.

As more of our devices (cars, homes, etc) become connected, we will become more and more vulnerable to the physical threat of cyber warfare.

 

Threat Assessment:

The Business Insider

David Choi

April 20, 2017

 

The CIA and FBI have reportedly launched a manhunt for the person responsible for leaking thousands of top-secret documents describing the CIA’s cyber-spying capabilities and tools.

In March, WikiLeaks published a trove of damaging files in an ongoing series of “Vault 7” leaks exposing the CIA’s wide-ranging tools and hacking capabilities used to snoop on various smartphones, smart televisions, computer systems, software and other devices.

Citing sources familiar with the investigation, CBS reports the CIA and FBI are looking for an insider believed to be a CIA employee or contractor who had physical access to the material.

However, they did not publicly specify when or how the material was stolen from the agency.

Describing the series of leaks as the “largest ever publication of confidential documents on the agency, “WikiLeaks previously said the documents and files came from “an isolated, high-security network situated inside the CIA’s Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virginia”.The notorious whistle-blowing site previously said the CIA recently “lost control of the majority of its hacking arsenal” ranging from malware and trojans to zero-day exploits and malware remote control systems.

The massive archive was apparently circulated among former US government hackers and contractors “in an unauthorized manner,” WikiLeaks said.

WikiLeaks said it obtained the material from former contractors who worked for US intelligence.

Hundreds of employees and contractors are said to have access to the documents held in a highly secure part of the CIA, the sources said. Investigators are beginning to work through those names.
While the CIA has yet to comment on the authenticity of WikiLeaks’ disclosures, multiple high-profile tech companies scrambled to detect and fix security flaws to protect their products following the leaks.

Last week, CIA director Mike Pompeo slammed WikiLeaks in his first public comments as spy agency chief calling the group a “hostile intelligence service.”.

He also accused founder Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, a former contractor who leaked NSA documents to journalists in 2013, of seeking to use sensitive information to “make a name for themselves”.

 “As long as they make a splash, they care nothing about the lives they put at risk or the damage they cause to national security,” Pompeo said. “It is time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is — a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia.
THE END

Continue reading

WikiLeaks unloads on the CIA

This is a breaking story and a blockbuster.

 

It would seem logical if there are any legitimate journalist out their they should nail this one down and win a Pulitzer.

Also, they might get on with their lives and get off Trump’s back so he can go about the tasks of being President of the United States.

Obama’s acts are sedition, a narcissist can’t see himself in prison, we certainly can.

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES (Source)

 

WikiLeaks

 

 

 

Julian Assange

March 7, 2017

Today, Tuesday 7 March 2017, WikiLeaks begins its new series of leaks on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Code-named “Vault 7” by WikiLeaks, it is the largest ever publication of confidential documents on the agency.

The first full part of the series, “Year Zero”, comprises 8,761 documents and files from an isolated, high-security network situated inside the CIA’s Center for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virgina.

It follows an introductory disclosure last month of CIA targeting French political parties and candidates in the lead up to the 2012 presidential election. (Source)

Recently, the CIA lost control of the majority of its hacking arsenal including malware, viruses, trojans, weaponized “zero day” exploits, malware remote control systems and associated documentation.

This extraordinary collection, which amounts to more than several hundred million lines of code, gives its possessor the entire hacking capacity of the CIA. The archive appears to have been circulated among former U.S. government hackers and contractors in an unauthorized manner, one of whom has provided WikiLeaks with portions of the archive.

“Year Zero” introduces the scope and direction of the CIA’s global covert hacking program, its malware arsenal and dozens of “zero day” weaponized exploits against a wide range of U.S. and European company products, include Apple’s iPhone, Google’s Android and Microsoft’s Windows and even Samsung TVs, which are turned into covert microphones.

Since 2001 the CIA has gained political and budgetary preeminence over the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).

The CIA found itself building not just its now infamous drone fleet, but a very different type of covert, globe-spanning force — its own substantial fleet of hackers.

The agency’s hacking division freed it from having to disclose its often controversial operations to the NSA (its primary bureaucratic rival) in order to draw on the NSA’s hacking capacities.

 

 

By the end of 2016, the CIA’s hacking division, which formally falls under the agency’s Center for Cyber Intelligence (CCI),  (Source) had over 5000 registered users and had produced more than a thousand hacking systems, trojans, viruses, and other “weaponized” malware. Such is the scale of the CIA’s undertaking that by 2016, its hackers had used more code than that used to run Facebook.

The CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” with even less accountability and without publicly answering the question whether such a massive budgetary spend on duplicating the capacities of a rival agency could be justified.

In a statement to WikiLeaks the source details policy questions that they say urgently need to be debated in public, including whether the CIA’s hacking capabilities exceed its mandated powers and the problem of public oversight of the agency.

The source wishes to start a public debate about the security, creation, use, proliferation and democratic control of cyber-weapons.

 

Once a single cyber ‘weapon’ is ‘loose’ it can spread around the world in seconds, to be used by rival states, cyber mafia and teenage hackers alike.

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks editor stated that “There is an extreme proliferation risk in the development of cyber ‘weapons’. Comparisons can be drawn between the uncontrolled proliferation of such ‘weapons’, which results from the inability to contain them combined with their high market value, and the global arms trade. But the significance of “Year Zero” goes well beyond the choice between cyber war and cyberspeace. The disclosure is also exceptional from a political, legal and forensic perspective.”

Comparisons can be drawn between the uncontrolled proliferation of such ‘weapons’, which results from the inability to contain them combined with their high market value, and the global arms trade. But the significance of “Year Zero” goes well beyond the choice between cyber war and cyberspeace. The disclosure is also exceptional from a political, legal and forensic perspective.”

But the significance of “Year Zero” goes well beyond the choice between cyber war and cyberspeace. The disclosure is also exceptional from a political, legal and forensic perspective.”

The disclosure is also exceptional from a political, legal and forensic perspective.”

See the entire article below.

 

 

Continue reading

We be paid to riot

crew-2231211So great, four days past the election and Soros is at it again.

 

He gets the dregs of humanity to fall out for theses fiascos and to his chagrin, Trump voters were not deterred.

 

george-soros-storm-troopers-aka-useful-idiots

A spineless financial backer of evil, Soros is never seen at any events he backs.

It won’t be long until the miscreant and the fat lady he won’t be funding at least for the 2016 presidential election will be sharing a double-wide grave.

The only question remaining? 

Who will be on top?

Blocks Of Anti-Trump Protest Buses Caught On Tape

Zero Hedge

by Tyler Durden

Nov 14, 2016

Earlier today we showed, contrary to USA Today’s claims that the anti-Trump protests across the nation are “spontaneous, involving people from all walks of life,” according to Wikileaks documents at least two of the people profiled by USA Today have a history of being professional agitators for the Democrat party.

Their task is to stir up popular protests and, in extreme cases, unleash rioting, such as the following clip showing the latest day of violent protests in Portland revealed.

 

qzprefjog9haicrgdegnwnsjf8f32bgsrheidnnjyac77ecg8o_xryokd9phlp3hzmjna7xcatpr25srtq17tdud3lqk_cq1cihgoaww7evwc9snrcuj6j3bxoeujbliue8kh_5fffolg6dgscquyw1lzgf0foj9gaas0-d-e1-ft

 

Now, courtesy of a Zero Hedge reader, we have visual confirmation of how a substantial portion of these professional, paid protesters arrive at the site of the protest, in this case Chicago.

The video was taken at 3:30pm on South Canal Street in Chicago on Saturday.

As our reader points out, hundreds of the participants that took part in the downtown Chicago protests from November 12 were bused in using these vehicles. Other arrived by train.

THE END

Continue reading

Latest Wikileaks eviscerates Hillary Clinton

crew-2231211Thank God for Julian Assange and his Wiki Leaks

 

 

Whistleblower Julian Assange has given one of his most incendiary interviews ever in a John Pilger Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films, where he summarises what can be gleaned from the tens of thousands of Clinton emails released by WikiLeaks this year.

John Pilger, another Australian émigré, conducted the 25-minute interview at the Ecuadorian Embassy, where Assange has been trapped since 2012 for fear of extradition to the US.

Last month, Assange had his internet access cut off for alleged “interference” in the American presidential election through the work of his website.

 

‘Clinton made FBI look weak, now there is anger’

John Pilger: What’s the significance of the FBI’s intervention in these last days of the U.S. election campaign, in the case against Hillary Clinton?

Julian Assange: If you look at the history of the FBI, it has become effectively America’s political police.

The FBI demonstrated this by taking down the former head of the CIA [General David Petraeus] over classified information given to his mistress.

Almost no-one is untouchable.  The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that no-one can resist us. 

But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.

The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that no-one can resist us.  But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.

But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI because it made the FBI look weak.

We’ve published about 33,000 of Clinton’s emails when she was Secretary of State.

They come from a batch of just over 60,000 emails, [of which] Clinton has kept about half – 30,000 — to herself, and we’ve published about half.

 

Then there are the Podesta emails we’ve published.

[John] Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign manager, so there’s a thread that runs through all these emails; there are quite a lot of pay-for-play, as they call it, giving access in exchange for money to states, individuals and corporations.

[These emails are] combined with the cover up of the Hillary Clinton emails when she was Secretary of State, [which] has led to an environment where the pressure on the FBI increases.

‘Russian government not the source of Clinton leaks’

See the entire article below.

 

Continue reading

Clinton: I don’t recall joking about droning Julian Assange

crew-2231211How typically convenient, she doesn’t remember.

 

Haven’t we heard that excuse ad nausea ?

It’s amazing how she has no problems remembering her lies, to numerous, to mention and repeats them on  Q, whenever needed.

9b1c9ad829dfcceaf11ac824afaf72b2

October 5,2016

Responding to unconfirmed allegations circulating on right-wing websites, Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that she does not remember ever joking about targeting the founder of WikiLeaks in a drone strike.

The conservative website True Pundit cited anonymous “State Department sources” in a report on Sunday to claim that Clinton in 2010 suggested to some staff members that the U.S. “drone” Julian Assange of WikiLeaks, whose website had embarrassed the U.S. when it published diplomatic cables, among other documents.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” the website claimed Clinton had said.

WikiLeaks, an anti-secrecy organization that publishes documents from governments, corporations, and other sources, tweeted out the quote from the True Pundit report on Monday. No mainstream news outlets have confirmed the claim.

“I don’t recall any joke,” Clinton said, when asked about the allegations at a press conference in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday.

“It would have been a joke, if it had been said, but I don’t recall that.”

The same reporter also asked Clinton about Assange’s recent promise to soon release documents that could affect the November election.

WikiLeaks published a series of internal Democratic National Committee communications that embarrassed the party on the eve of its July convention, and suggested there was more to come.

“Are you worried that there’s anything that could come out that would upend the race?” the reporter asked Clinton.

“Well, I don’t know anything about what he’s talking about,” Clinton said, before responding to the drone comment allegations.

 

THE END

Continue reading

Official Labor Day Kickoff Report – Hillary Is Out…

The Game is underway.

Nobody gives a shit about any of that background crap.

Here’s where we are, late in the 3rd quarter:

With the help of numerous questionable calls from the officials, Hillary was able to break one free into the open field.

Thinking she was set to go the distance, she began her high step – Deion Sanders style – and never saw the Email Safety coming in like a hog-seeking rocket from her blind side. (photo below)

 

dance-it-in

Earl of Taint

They took her to the locker room following her fumble.

And also her apparent concussion with possible blood clotting and risk of massive stroke, too.

She’s had a few scans (all negative) along with several adult beverages and is resting comfortably under constant Abedin care.

She is expected to return in the crucial 4th quarter of the contest but she will only play as much as is needed to drag her battered and drunken carcass over the goal line.

And at the end of the 3rd quarter we’re still all tied up, 50 to 50.

League officials confirm, the Email Safety plays for the Wikileaks Trots and entered the game uninvited.

Team Trump will not be penalized on the play.

Image below, taken one month after the game when Hilda was pumped full of steroids.

For those readers who have not been keeping up with what has been laid out to deceive us an update by Joe Dan Gorman from his Intellectual Froglegs most recent offering, as in today 🙂

It appears, there is no one left in her cheering section but Barry.

The only one left cheering her on is “Big Eared Barry.”

 

dementia-1

Earl of Taint

The only way the image below could be better:

blPMozGYhuRujP1DeHHUSub05IjK3DtlkToczlmLLZSmVht0v_pbcl71sqyCkFxREUMjyrKSaqvROfb1I6ramjbeChnjmbKXSUVQ3GHNx6p140bl3wo8LHKFfNvx-eKHHRgTbYGYtMw3JKATMvzQ=s0-d-e1-ft

If the artist had thought to put FBI Headquarters, office of Director James Comey on it.

THE END

Continue reading

Mainstream Media Admits It May “Never Recover” from 2016 Election

crew-2231211By Jim Campbell,

August 31, 2016

 

Would America have been better off if the venerable “Old Lady,” had been burned to the ground or shut its doors completely?

Their readership has plummeted as has their advertisers. (Source)

How bad are things really when one considers its the NYT in the link above reporting on its own pending demise.

Here’s a different source. (Source)

Not an excellent business model for a sustainable operation.

 

tumblr_lkzy45ZC761qzs5cqo1_500
H/T: AntiMedia – In a revealing statement that flew largely under the radar earlier this month, members of the mainstream media admitted it would never recover from its irresponsible and negligent coverage of the 2016 presidential election.

hellA recent column published in the New York Post referred to the media’s reporting as “the complete collapse of American journalism as we know it.”

In his article for the Post, Fox News contributor Michael Goodwin discussed the media’s pro-Clinton bias – one recognized by supporters of virtually every other presidential candidate, from Bernie Sanders to Jill Stein to Gary Johnson and, of course, Donald Trump.

Even Americans who don’t necessarily have a horse in the 2016 race notice the slant.

“By torching its remaining credibility in service of Clinton,” Goodwin wrote, “the mainstream media’s reputations will likely never recover, nor will the standards. No future producer, editor, reporter or anchor can be expected to meet a test of fairness when that standard has been trashed in such willful and blatant fashion.”

Indeed, he is correct in this regard.
The Clinton machine has effectively infiltrated corporate media.  Of course there is a song for this.

Last year, the Intercept reported MSNBC failed to disclose that multiple pundits who spoke favorably about Clinton were actually employees of a consulting firm hired by her campaign.

More recently, embarrassing Wikileaks  released in July revealed DNC officials attempted to craft narratives painting Sanders in a negative light to undermine his campaign.

They also organized a secret fundraiser with the Washington Post and were careful to keep it under the radar.

There is no question the mainstream media has sided with the political establishment in its decision to craft narratives that paint Clinton as a competent leader who is the only option in the face of a catastrophic Trump presidency.

Indeed, in spite of Clinton’s lack of popularity among the general population, the media continues to suggest she is the only thing standing between America and its descent into fascism.

While the degree of negative press Trump has received is undeniably staggering, Goodwin failed to recognize, at least in this article, that like Clinton, Trump is wildly unpopular and the mainstream media is undoubtedly fervent in their coverage of Trump.

Therein lies the problem: rarely does the mainstream media devote as much time to questioning Hillary Clinton, her rhetoric, and her policies.

From the corporate media’s flagrantly irresponsible coverage of the Iraq War during the Bush years to the media’s ongoing blackouts of relevant news in favor of more superficial, inconsequential stories,

Goodwin’s assertion that 2016 is the year American journalism died is as factual as the content churned out by Fox News.

 

THE END

Continue reading