How could the Trump Administration Possibly Have Leaked Classified Information When it’s his to declassify?

She is absolutely right when the final determination is made by Special Prosecutor Robert, Mueller, and his staff, President Trump will be completely exonerated by the purveyors of fake news and partisan progressive hacks.

 

It’s time to get to the bottom of this so that our country can get back to the business of creating a pro-growth, pro-jobs, environment in the process of “Making America Again.”

America has been in a precipitous free fall since L.B.J., and then it had new jet engines put on it by the woeful Obama administration and their Marxist allies on the left.

 

 

 

Love her or hate her, Ann Coulter brought up the end all conclusion.

Trump couldn’t possibly leak classified information, it’s his to unclassfy.

The fake news industry goes into overdrive.

Ann Coulter
May 18, 2017

Every time I try to be mad at Trump, the media reel me back in by launching some ridiculous, unprovoked attack.
This time, it’s the fake news story about Trump “leaking” classified information to the Russkies. 

The president can’t “leak” classified information: It’s his to declassify. (Source)

The big secret Trump allegedly revealed is that Muslims might try to blow up a plane with laptops.

I already knew that. I read it in The New York Times. HA!

The New York Times, March 22, 2017: 

Devices Banned on Some Planes Over ISIS Fears

“Intelligence showing that the Islamic State is developing a bomb hidden in portable electronics spurred the United States and Britain on Tuesday to bar passengers from airports in a total of 10 Muslim-majority countries from carrying laptop computers … two senior American counterterrorism officials said. …”

This totally secret, Deep Throat-level information has been widely published in thousands of news outlets throughout the civilized world. There was yet another round of stories last week with the update that the U.S. is considering a laptop ban on flights from Europe as well. 

Hey, you know what might make more sense than banning laptops? How about banning Muslims? 

Bear with me here, I’m still working out the details, but I’m almost certain a federal judge in Hawaii can’t block a president’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration just because he’s testy with Trump over some campaign statements. 

As Northwestern law professor Eugene Kontorovich explained in The Washington Post, courts have never examined a politician’s campaign statements for improper motive, because 1) campaigns are not part of the deliberative process; and 2) to start doing so would open the door to “examinations of the entire lives of political officials whose motives may be relevant to legal questions.”

Nonetheless, Kontorovich says, that is the legal argument being advanced against Trump’s travel ban: “Trump is a bigot, and thus his winning presidential campaign, in fact, impeaches him from exercising key constitutional and statutory powers, such as administering the immigration laws.” 

To preserve their judicial coup, this Monday, the 9th Circuit sent out the geriatric ward to hear an appeal of the Hawaii judge’s absurd ruling. At their ages, there’s a good chance the judges will be dead by the time the Supreme Court overturns them. 

SEE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE BELOW