Comment by Jim Campbell
September 18th, 2019
A sure sign that a boat won’t float is when “Squinty and the Meatpuppet, two very confused leftist television commentators start taking shots at a story.’
Perhaps they have been told that their contracts at MSLSD will not be renewed and they are trying to position themselves for work at a credible network.
The duo’s lives revolve around three simple things.
(1) Barely producing cognitive thoughts.
They do nothing, they learn squat, they know diddly, they hate the conservatives – and, amazingly, they manage to avoid being thrown out of MSNBC.
(2) Trying to score with celebrities – something they’ll never achieve.
(3) Watching TV. Lots of TV.
If something in the real world doesn’t relate to what they know from TV, it sucks.
They especially enjoy “reviewing” the actions of Trump – or just commenting inanely on him.
If the news contains Trump, conservative thought, or mentions an improving economy, it sucks to them.
Thus, their mission in life.
‘I’m just so surprised that candidates are making conclusions here that are impossible to make’
By By Kyle Drennen
September 18, 2019
Morning Joe hosts Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough ripped the Times‘s decision to run a story about new allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh without including vital context about the story. and report the truth.”
That’s not a joke, they actually honored The Morning Joe co-hosts during the organization’s annual First Amendment Awards dinner on March 8 in Washington, D.C.
The couple specifically received the Leonard Zeidenberg First Amendment Award for “a radio or television journalist or news executive who has made a major contribution to the protection of First Amendment freedoms.” (Source)
Over the course of the past year, the pair have routinely offered similarly unhinged commentary against the President.
Apparently hurling outrageous accusations that violate every principle of journalistic ethics makes them eligible for an award.
The Times published an essay adapted from a forthcoming book about the Kavanaugh confirmation battle in which two Times reporters claimed to have “uncovered a previously unreported story” about alleged sexual misconduct during Kavanaugh’s college years.
“A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student,” the Times reporters wrote.
They added that this allegation “echoes” the allegation made by Deborah Ramirez, who alleged Kavanaugh “thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent” during a party in college.
On Sunday night, the Times added a note to the story correcting a factual omission.
The reporters excluded that the victim of Stier’s alleged incident “declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident.”
“Wait a second, a woman who Stier claims was abused by Kavanaugh, has she denied this?
Has she claimed this happened? Why is there this glaring omission in the New York Times story?
There were Mollie Hemingway and others on Twitter were saying that, in fact, she had no recollection of this happening and her friends were saying the same thing,” Scarborough said.
“And I could not believe the New York Times would write this piece without that information contained in it. Are you surprised 24 hours—is it 24 hours went by before they clarified that fact?” he said, adding the article also did not note that Stier was the opposing counsel to Kavanaugh during their work on the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
“I don’t understand why they didn’t put this information in the article. Did that strike you as strange?”
“Yeah, that’s certainly good context being provided here about Stier.
We were talking about this yesterday and were puzzled and remain so that if the woman involved is saying that she didn’t remember, that raises questions about the piece,” Associated Press reporter Jonathan Lemire responded.
“Certainly, the New York Times has made their own editorial judgments about what should be included.
Scarborough pointed out each of the major three allegations against Kavanaugh had issues with corroborating witnesses.
“Here we have, again, a New York Times piece where Brett Kavanaugh is accused of something and, again, the very woman who was the alleged victim in this alleged incident is saying she doesn’t recall it happening,” he said.
Brzezinski addressed the political implications of the new allegations.
Senators Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) called on Kavanaugh to resign, along with fellow 2020 candidates Beto O’Rourke (D.), Julian Castro (D.), and Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D.).
Both former vice president Joe Biden (D.) and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.) called for further investigation into the allegations.
“There has not been any new statements from any of the candidates since the Times updated the story overnight, that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the episode,” Brzezinski said, pointing out there are still many unanswered questions.
“I’m just so surprised that candidates are making conclusions here that are impossible to make, again.”