House Passes Motion Blocking Bid to Impeach Trump

Comment by Jim Campbell

July 18th 2019

Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is having difficulty keeping her indians on the resevation, as many of them continue to push for the parties continued irrelevance.

Join the red wave that will give the Republican’s the majority in the House of Representatives again while sending Nancy Pelosi packing.

The vote made it clear many Democrats are eager to pursue removing the President. from office despite party leaders’ calls for caution

The vote to table the resolution comes as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) has worked to avoid launching impeachment proceedings. Win McNamee/Getty Images

Those voting not to impeach are likely looking at the upcoming 2020 election knowing that an aye vote would put a target on their backs.

The Wall Street Journal

By Natalie Andrews

July 18, 2019

WASHINGTON—The House voted Wednesday to block an effort to impeach President Trump, but the tally made clear that many Democrats are eager to pursue removing him from office despite party leaders’ calls for caution.

In the first test of the divisive issue since Democrats took control of the chamber, lawmakers voted 332 to 95 to kill the resolution, with all votes against the measure coming from Democrats.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) has tried to hold the line on launching impeachment proceedings, which she sees as premature and politically risky.

But outrage over Mr. Trump’s racist tweets about four lawmakers earlier this week prompted Rep. Al Green (D., Texas) to introduce the new impeachment push Tuesday.

He unveiled the resolution shortly after the House voted, largely along party lines, to condemn the president’s remarks.

Pelosi Calls Trump's Tweets 'Racist,' Sending House Floor Into Chaos
The House of Representatives passed a resolution condemning President Trump’s tweets as racist. Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s remarks sparked scenes of chaos on the floor. Photo: Getty Images

Because Mr. Green’s resolution was privileged under House rules, it forced a vote.

The new article of impeachment focused on Mr. Trump’s behavior and moral fitness to be president and not on whether he had engaged in obstruction of justice, as the previous resolutions had.

When Republicans held the majority, Democrats forced a vote on impeachment twice. In both cases, the GOP successfully moved to table the resolution.

The impeachment push has divided the Democratic Party. That split was evident in Wednesday’s vote, in which nearly 100 Democrats, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York, opposed the measure to kill the impeachment resolution. One Democratic lawmaker, Peter DeFazio of Oregon, voted “present.”

In all, there are 235 Democrats in the House.

The tally against tabling the measure “was higher than I thought,” said Jim McGovern (D., Mass.), who is the chairman of the Rules Committee and voted against the measure. “And I think that if the resolution had been focused on obstruction of justice, it might’ve been even higher.“

Mr. Green said his effort didn’t fail, in his opinion, because it showed momentum.

“We got 66 the last time,” he said of the vote tally. “This is not a sprint, it’s a marathon.”

In a series of tweets Wednesday, Mr. Trump called the impeachment effort “perhaps the most ridiculous and time consuming project I have ever had to work on.” He painted the vote as a lasting victory, saying: “Impeachment of your President… is now OVER,” though there is nothing to prevent the House from trying to impeach the president at a later date.

The revived impeachment push came as Mrs. Pelosi has tried to hold the Democrats together. In one effort to keep the party united, Mrs. Pelosi is looking to set up a meeting with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.), an influential freshman who has challenged party leaders.

Drew Hammill, the speaker’s deputy chief of staff, said that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez contacted the California Democrat on Tuesday to ask for a meeting and that they are working to schedule the talk.

In an interview Wednesday on CBS News, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez said “absolutely,” when asked if she wanted to meet with the speaker. The New York lawmaker said that while House Democrats had disagreements on policy, it “does not mean that there is a fundamental fracture or a dehumanizing going on within our caucus.”

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, a backer of liberal priorities such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, has had several public disagreements with Mrs. Pelosi, who has implored Democrats to keep a united front against Republicans.

Their most recent dispute flared over a resolution to send emergency funding for the humanitarian crisis at the southern U.S. border.

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, along with close allies Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, pushed for more restrictions on how officials could spend the money.

The intraparty squabble paused Sunday, when Democrats united around the four women after President Trump tweeted that the congresswomen, all minorities, should “go back” to fix what he called the “totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” As lawmakers, all are U.S. citizens, and all but one were born in the U.S.

Mr. Trump kept up his attacks Wednesday night, individually attacking all four congresswomen and saying, “They don’t love our country. I think in some cases they hate our country.”

The crowd chanted “send her back” in response to Mr. Trump’s rebukes of Ms. Omar and erupted in boos at the mention of each lawmaker.

THE END

About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to House Passes Motion Blocking Bid to Impeach Trump

  1. JAFC says:

    They should have put it to a vote, just to identify all the individual radicals who’d have voted for it (or who’d have abstained).

    Like

  2. Opinion says:

    We must keep in mind that an Impeachment Hearing would be a public event (trial) with both sides heard by all Americans.

    The Mueller Investigation was a very secret event with almost no information being released to the public. The Demand for Disclosure by President trump has been ignored. The facts appear to confirm that Mueller knew the Steele Dossier was fake and should have stopped the investigation immediately! The continuation of the Mueller Investigation will morph into an act of Sedition and all of the guilty parties face a death sentence.

    Looking at an Impeachment Trial the Democrats will be forced to make specific claims and formal charges against President Trump and then both sides will have an opportunity to be heard. One issue to be raised would include the First Amendment and Free Speech. Of course, the U. S. Constitution is the Law of the Land and would be the specific source to settle any conflicts of interpretation of the Law.

    The Democrats would be forced to provide evidence and proof along with witnesses to be cross-examined. The same is true for the President Trump Team. The burden of proof is on the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi knows that there is no such evidence against President Trump but their is loads of negative evidence about her, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, Diane Feinstein, and the entire “Get Trump” conspiracy. The conspiracy of the Democrats to un-seat a sitting president is an act of Sedition and these counter claims would be a necessary pert of any Impeachment Hearing.

    Of course, every one knows that to convict President Trump would take 60% of the Senate and that is simply not going to happen!

    IMO = The Democrats do not want to face the question = Where is Justice Ginsberg/ IMO = Ginsberg has been dead for many months and all of the Democrats are hiding this information from us Americans.

    WHER IS JUSTICE GINSBERG?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.