By Jim Campbell
July 9th, 2018
One nation has two sets of laws.
One for the left.
Another for everyone else.
Look no further than the Clinton’s and how they have worked the system as our entire system of jurisprudence appears to be circling the drain.
Please Hillary must spare us several body bags before she is unceremoniously dumped into one of them?
Moving along, a leftist activist judge Amy Berman apparently has Paul Manafort confused with a killer as she revokes his bale and sends him to prison pending trial?
The D.C. Court system must honor her with a statue to commemorate her woeful behavior from the bench.
A Obama appointee, she is still his lap dog and would make an excellent candidate for impeachment.
That of course won’t happen as the District of Columbia is filled with leftists who have made their entire careers sucking off the government teat at the taxpayers expense.
Where was he going to go?
Wouldn’t turning in his passport have sufficed?
Certainly when not upholding the law is someone’s priority.
Listen to the words of a sage Native American in the short video below.
Why does he understand the idiotic concept of not protecting a country’s sovereignty and our judges don’t?
It seems more than plausible that one of Muller’s henchman gave her the word and she complied.
Since we are unlikely to impeach them than perhaps they should be put out on to the ice to die.
This could make a big difference on their thought patterns.
The discussion below is clearly where the rubber meets the road on the entire fiasco.
Judge Jeanine and Tom Fritton of Judicial Watch’s open up with both barrels below.
How bad is Judge Berman?
Please make up your own mind after reading what follows below.
Amy Berman Jackson is a traitor.
Amy Berman Jackson is a Judge on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson has rejected President Barack Obama’s assertion of executive privilege to deny Congress access to records pertaining to Operation Fast and Furious, a gunrunning probe that allegedly allowed thousands of weapons to flow across the border into Mexico. (This was not a good thing)
Jackson ruled Tuesday (January 19, 2016) that the Justice Department’s public disclosures about its response to the so-called “gun walking” controversy undercut Obama’s executive privilege claim.
Complete abuse of power.
“There is no need to balance the need against the impact that the revelation of any record could have on candor in future executive decision-making, since any harm that might flow from the public revelation of the deliberations at issue here has already been self-inflicted,” Jackson wrote.
“The Department itself has already publicly revealed the sum and substance of the very material it is now seeking to withhold.
Since any harm that would flow from the disclosures sought here would be merely incremental, the records must be produced.”
Apparently she is not a fan of so-called, transparency?
Jackson said she wasn’t questioning the propriety of Obama’s claim of privilege, but ruling that the claim could not be sustained in view of other information the Justice Department had released on the topic, chiefly an Office of Inspector General report released in September 2012.
Just another coverup !
“This ruling is not predicated on a finding that the withholding was intended to cloak wrongdoing on the part of government officials or that the withholding itself was improper,” the judge wrote.
She has several screws loose or a number of off shore bank accounts.
The standoff over the records led to a House vote in June 2012 holding then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over the records.
The House later initiated a lawsuit to try to force disclosure of the files.
The case was repeatedly delayed in an unsuccessful effort to broker a settlement.
Would law-abiding citizens have expected anything different?
The administration initially asked Jackson to throw out the suit altogether, arguing that the legislative and executive branches should use their own methods to sort out the dispute.
However, the judge ruled in 2013 that the fight was an appropriate one for the courts to resolve.
She also rejected the administration’s efforts to appeal the case at that time, before she issued a definitive ruling.
No confusion on what side she is on!
Jackson, an Obama appointee, left open the possibility in her ruling Tuesday (January 19, 2016) that some of the disputed records could still be held back from Congress because they contain sensitive information on law enforcement techniques, implicate foreign policy concerns or discuss matters covered by attorney-client privilege.
All right this is pure and simple horse shit and poor quality at that.
To not definitely rule as to the inclusion of all records shows a disdain for the powers of Congress.
Therein, Amy Berman Jackson is a traitor for not upholding the tenets of the Constitution. (Source)
What happened to “Innocent until Proven Guilty.”