The progressive party in the United States has but two swords to fall the Rich more.” and “The rich don’t pay their fair share.
Can the reader come forward with any legislation that made America a better place during the 8-years of tyrannical failed ” Residency,” to add to his resume (Source)
Would progressives lie or cheat?
Of course, how else are they to get elected?
Image above: Sally Tudor’s Texas Tea Party Patriots (Source)
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
People oppose this tax cut because they’ve been told it’s a tax hike
“In fact, it probably doesn’t help individuals who are below $200,000, given the analysis we’ve seen thus far. It is not a middle-class tax cut.”
The bill doubles both the standard deduction and the child tax credit, expanding the credit to make it more refundable — meaning lower-income families can get a refund of more than they paid in income taxes.
See the entire article below.
So the richer are paying a greater share of federal taxes under this bill, and 70 percent of Americans will get a tax cut under it. Yet, when polled just before the bill passed, only 17 percent said they believed they would get a tax cut, while 32 percent said they expected to pay more.
So of all the people who would see a tax cut, less than 1 in 4 knows it. Of all the people who expect to see a tax hike, less than 1 in 5 will.
This is a clear sign of the failure of the media to accurately cover the bill, and it also explains the bill’s deep unpopularity.
There were plenty of little lies and ridiculous stories along the way. There was the line that the bill cut taxes for corporate jets. This turned out to be a codification of an Obama-era rule clarification.
There was also the assertion, made famous by Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., that the bill hikes taxes on the poor, or something. The story here was that repealing the health insurance mandate would free some people from the fine, thus allowing them to not get Obamacare-approved insurance. If poor people are buying less health insurance, then they get fewer Obamacare subsidies, which if you just look at the numbers (without accounting for the premiums they’d have to pay) looks like it’s costing them something.
Calling this a cut in benefits for the poor is like lamenting a forgone Black Friday shopping spree for all the “savings” missed.
And then there was story after story that pretended the bill didn’t cut middle-class taxes. It made this pretense by ignoring the years 2018 through 2025, and focusing only on what happens when the individual tax cuts expire. Judging a provision only by what it does when it expires is odd, and probably unprecedented in policy journalism. It goes to show that some writers will resort to anything.
The tax bill Republicans are passing is deeply unpopular precisely because people don’t believe it is a tax cut. What does that tell you? It says that people like tax cuts. That’s a truth hard for our left-leaning press to come to terms with, and in this tax debate, they never did.
THE END