A 2003 study by Professor John J. Donohue & Ian Ayres, which questioned whether allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons really deterred violent crimes, was mentioned in the Columbus Dispatch article on a Ohio Senate Bill which allows concealed-carry permit holders to bring their guns into bars and restaurants. (Source)
No reputable journal would publish his findings.
H/T Bearing Arms.
August 14, 2017
No big shock that some leftist professor would release a report lying about law biding gun owners.
Stanford professor John J. Donohue released a research paper claiming that Right to Carry legislation in increasing violent crime.
Oregon is a shall issue (“right-to-carry”) state and the CPRC shows that the percentage of Oregon “permit holders who were convicted of any type of felony, violent or nonviolent” in 2016 was .0074 percent.
Moreover, the CPRC stresses that “these cases are unlikely to involve firearms.”
Additionally, Oklahoma is a shall-issue state and the percentage of permit holders convicted of a felony in 2016 was .0071 percent, in 2015 it was .0062 percent, in 2014 it was .0069 percent and in 2013 it was .0078 percent.
Minnesota is also a shall-issue state, and the percentage of concealed permit holders convicted of assault in 2016 was .000 percent, the percentage convicted in 2015 was .000 percent and the percentage in 2014 was .000 percent.
And the list goes on.
The point is simply that the information on “right-to-carry permit holders” is extant and available (CPRC found it).
And without it, a study on the dangers of “right-to-carry” laws seems to be a bridge too far.
As CPRC’s John Lott commented:See the entire article below.
Donohue claims that permit holders are committing violent crimes at high rates (actually his claim rests on them committing aggravated assaults with firearms), but the evidence from state police shows that permit holders are incredibly law-abiding.
His response is that somehow all the police departments across the US are making mistakes in missing out on these crimes, but he offers no evidence for this claim.Take the data for Texas in the newest report from the Crime Prevention Research Center.In 2016, only 0.00067 percent of permit holders were convicted of an aggravated assault (with or without a firearm).And there is the presumption that some of Texas’ 1.2 million permit holders would have committed such a crime even if concealed handgun permits weren’t allowed.(Of course, this ignores any benefits from these permit holders.)
There is a reason that over two-thirds of published, peer-reviewed studies find that Right-to-Carry laws reduce violent crime rates in the U.S. (Source)
All but one other paper, another by these authors, has claimed that Right-to-Carry laws exert no bad influence on any violent crime rates. Donohue keeps making the same statistical mistakes over and over again, and he never even bothers to explain why he is ignoring these critiques.In addition to the aforementioned problems with Donohue’s claims, it is also noteworthy to point out that concealed-carry permit holders—whether in a “right-to-carry” state or not—pass a background check to acquire their permits. Moreover, they are required to demonstrate knowledge regarding when it is legal to use deadly force and when it is not. All of this is to say that gun controllers are ubiquitously after illegal guns and illegal gun owners; concealed permit holders do not fit into those categories.