A Short Primer on the Hierarchy of Identity Politics: White Privelege


Satire by Jim O’Neill, but oh so true!


The other day I decided to rank the hierarchy of liberal victimhood and it turned out to be a thornier process than I thought it would be.

It is common knowledge that male privilege and white privilege automatically places white men at the bottom of the identity politics pile.


It stands to reason that, simply by default, black females must be at the top of the heap.

 So, simple enough – black females are at the apex of the identity politics pyramid.


But then I read an article that threw that simple answer into question.  

The article claimed that people of average or below average intelligence are victims of “cognitive privilege.”


That is, people of average or lower intelligence are victimized by people who are smarter.


This new insight meant that I had to go back to the drawing board and rethink my whole victimhood model.

Dan Williams, quoted in “Check your ‘cognitive privilege,’ all you smart people!” by Thomas Lifson  (Source)  


There are many kinds of privilege besides white privilege: cognitive privilege, for example.

See the entire article below.


We now know that intelligence is not something we have significant control over but is something we are born with.

We are living in a society in which success is increasingly linked to one’s intelligence.

Thus, the accident of having been born smart enough to be able to be successful is a great benefit that you did absolutely nothing to earn.



Personally, I believe that wisdom is much more important than intelligence, but we won’t go there just now.

To return to the topic at hand, if smart is bad, then ipso facto dumb is good.

If given the choice between a smart black woman and a dumb black woman, the dumb black woman is obviously the more aggrieved party, the greater victim, and therefore beats out the smart black woman in the race to the top of the victimhood pyramid.


So, new winner – dumb black women.

Not so fast – what about transgender men.

Shouldn’t their victimhood supersede woman chauvinistically flaunting female gender privilege?  Of course it should.

So, the winner of the identity politics battle is not stupid black women, but stupid black men who want to be stupid black women.

It’s a no-brainer really.

But that begs the question — what about stupid black women who want to be stupid black men?  Now there’s a conundrum for you.

Who is at the apex, the pinnacle of liberal identity politics, the summum bonum of victimhood – stupid black men who want to be stupid black women, or stupid black women who want to be stupid black men?  I believe the jury is still out on that one.

I hope this short primer has helped to clarify things.  I hesitate to mention this, but there are more contenders than I have mentioned vying for the crown of “Biggest Loser in Identity Politics.”  I honestly don’t know how liberals keep track of all of their victims.  Kind of impressive in its own weird way.




About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in A Short Primer on the Hierarchy of Identity Politics: White Privelege and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Short Primer on the Hierarchy of Identity Politics: White Privelege

  1. Dave the Differentiator says:

    The very idea that “victims’ are the proper measure of anything is simply wrong.

    Life has a measure for winners not losers. There are nay number of examples that come to mind. Sports are a perfect example of the concept. Take a 100 yard race – there is but one winner and all of the other after the winners are losers.

    Then there is the money yard stick. As we compete for jobs and achievement toward our goals, money becomes the common denominator of measurement of success.

    As for the so-called victims. who cares? Work and become successful or move out of the way.

    Do not complain to me about reporting the facts, but we all know the truth. Work, study and learn to obtain the necessary skill set to perform your job and you will get the appropriate rewards. At least that is the theory!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.