If the article below is to be believed and it seems credible particularly after the interview with Sean Hannity who has a solid reputation as a journalist and investigative reporter.
So here we are again, re-sawing sawdust when what real journalists would have done would be to have investigated the criminal involvement of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections among a platheora of other probable criminal acts.
They have chosen to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear because of course, she’s an admitted progressive.
Those on the right side of the political spectrum will agree, those on the left who view him.
I agree he can come off that way, but his credibility has not been in doubt.
By Jordan Fabian
July 12, 2017
Lawmakers investigating Russian election meddling are expected to ask President Trump’s eldest son to testify about his June 2016 meeting with lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who has close ties to the Kremlin.
Trump Jr. has previously said he was willing to cooperate with the probe but had not said whether he would offer his account under penalty of perjury.
A stunning chain of emails Trump Jr. exchanged with an intermediary while setting up the meeting, which he disclosed Tuesday, clearly indicated he was eager to accept damaging information about Clinton’s campaign from Russia, a longtime U.S. adversary
Trump Jr. insisted he acted appropriately and that the meeting did not yield any dirt on Clinton, while also admitting to Hannity he would have handled the encounter differently.
“They had something — maybe concrete evidence to all the stories that I’d been hearing about, but they were probably underreported for years, not just during the campaign.
So I think I wanted to hear it out,” he said.
But President Trump’s eldest son said the meeting “went nowhere and it was apparent that that wasn’t what the meeting was actually about.”
“I wouldn’t have even remembered it until you started scouring through this stuff.
It was literally just a wasted 20 minutes, which was a shame,” he said.
See entire article below.
The Democrats are working hard to paint a picture of Trump Corruption – since the start of this so-called investigation. Still not evidence that there was any Russian involvement with the Trump folks.
It is difficult to see how any of this equates to a criminal act.
Has there been any evidence that this attorney with so-called Russian connections was doing anything criminal?
The entire “Investigation” of Trump does not appear to have any substance or direction.
There are a number of U. S. Constitutional guarantees about the basis of any accusations against any person. The actual person must be identified. The actual criminal act must be identified. The claims must be very specific as to who, when, where, what with adequate detail fir the accused party -, m TRUMP – to cross examine the accuser.
This so-called “Investigation” appears to be a sophomoric playground jealousy prank that has no place being pursued by the FBI
There has never been even one piece of credible evidence produced by the FBI.
The FBI should know better than to start this type of process without any evidence at all!
How can they conduct an investigation and why would he testify about an accusation that is completely fraudulent, believed only by progressive thugs and media pimps and whores?