Within 30 years we will no longer use sex to procreate: Actual government funded study

Fortunately we have the expertise of Ms. Nicole Arbour to shed her infinite wisdom on the subject.

 

Ms. Arbour has a penchant for saying fuck more frequently than a United States Marine Corps Drill Instructor.

If this might bother the reader, move along, you likely don’t belong on this site in the first place.

Hank Greely, Stanford University Professor of Law and Bio-sciences, believes the reproductive process will begin with parents choosing from a range of embryos created in a lab with their DNA.

Forget about the fact that in-vitro fertilization has been conducted successfully in humans since 1959. (Source)

Let’s not also forget that sexual intercourse, screwing, fucking, you name it is among America’s favorite past times.

Seriously, how often does the average individual of reproductive age think about bone dancing?

 

A study from a Ohio State University shows that the real number is more like every 4,275 seconds, or about once an hour, not so different from how often women in the study thought about sex (about once every two hours).

Men in the study were also more likely than women to think about other physical desires, including sleep and eating.

As if this study weren’t awesome enough already, it also looked at whether men were more likely than women to report thinking about sex simply because it’s such a common and accepted stereotype about them.

Sure enough, the study found that gender had less to do with how often people thought about sex than whether they felt positive about sex in general.

In other words, the more positively men and women felt about sex, the more they thought about it.

The study also found that women who were more concerned about what their peers thought of them reported thinking about sex less often (no difference for men in that department).

Apparently sometimes quality and quantity do go hand in hand. (Source)

Now go think about something sexy.

 

The Independent Online

The Independent Online

ShehShehabe   Kahn

July 4, 2017

 

 

Within three decades people will no longer be having sex to procreate, a professor from Stanford University has said.

 

 

Hank Greely, the director of Stanford’s Law School’s Center for Law and the Bio-sciences, believes the reproductive process will begin with parents choosing from a range of embryos created in a lab with their DNA.

Although this can already take place, Mr Greely believes it will become far cheaper to do so and couples will opt for this method to prevent diseases.

 

See the entire article below.

 

The process involves taking a female skin sample to create stem cells, which is then used to create eggs.

These eggs are then fertilized with sperm cells, resulting in a selection of embryos.

Screening of the embryos would highlight any potential diseases and the Stanford professor believes the process will get to a point where parents can also potentially have the ability to choose eye or hair color.

“I think one of the hardest things about this will be all the divorces that come about when she wants embryo number 15 and he wants embryo number 64,” Mr Greely said at Aspen Ideas Festive, Tribune reported.

“I think the decision-making will be a real challenge for people. How do you weigh a slightly higher chance of diabetes with slightly lower risk of schizophrenia against better musical ability and a much lower risk of colon cancer? Good luck.”

 

 

 

THE END

 

 

 

Advertisements

About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in Within 30 years we will no longer use sex to procreate: Actual government funded study and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Within 30 years we will no longer use sex to procreate: Actual government funded study

  1. Stealth General says:

    I doubt that artificial insemination will become the norm, however with the proliferation of openness (media) on gay marriage and relationships, we may hear more about it.

    On the other hand, the progressives’ move to create a perfect man-made race (similar to the Hitler movement) could make this the norm. It certainly fits with their utopian outlook.

    Oh well, I’ll just keep with the ” rub, grind, and pump” method of procreation for the rest of my natural (or unnatural) life! 😎

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Dave house says:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    Like

  3. JAFC says:

    Orwell’s “1984” is too hard, and too expensive to happen. Huxley’s “Brave New World” is our more likely dystopia.

    They whole goal of Margaret Sanger’s eugenics movement was to manage the human herd through selective breeding, to eliminate lower intelligence and physical handicap (along with eliminating the sick, lame, and lazy so common amongst us).

    Aldus Huxley was convinced that high intelligence (statistically, anyone with an IQ above 120 on the Stanford-Benet scale), thought then – as now – to be a function of brain structure, wasn’t such a great thing if everybody had it. So he proposed that most people be genetically created to function as a working class (the Deltas), directed by a moderately smart group (the Betas), with a socio-scientific elite (the Alphas) running things at the top.

    This scheme eliminates social dissent, ensures domestic harmony, and (since EVERYBODY is a test-tube baby) the possibility of blood-line Elite rule becomes impossible. And as nobody lives longer than 35 years (biologically, everybody times out), generational conflicts can’t happen either.

    Brave New World is written from the viewpoint of an Alpha (who, like most Alphas. is unsettled by things but cannot avoid the happy logic behind it). It’s a world rife with pleasure closely built into the social system.

    Anyway, that’s the goal of The New World Order. Like the hero of the novel, I’ve got my qualms about it.

    Like

  4. malenurseken says:

    There wont be 30 more years anyway so!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s