House Subpoenas Elevate Probe Into Improper Intelligence Surveillance

So the Democrats want to play hard ball with the Republicans?


This will not likely come to our attention by the leftist media who still has viewers that absorb their nonsense.

Excellent that this is coming about.

Seriously, a Muslim CIA Director, in Brenner, Powers a devoted Obama Marxist/communist, and Susan Rice the untrustworthy lying Sunday talk show puppet that churns out the lies to cover Democrat malfeasance.

If Babe Ruth were alive today he would have been a Republican.

UN Ambassador Samantha Power sought names of Americans hidden in communications intercept.


                              Muslim CIA Director, Marxist Obama Lover, and proven liar

BY: Bill Gertz

June 2, 2017

Power declined to comment through a spokesman.

Rice and Brennan did not return emails seeking comment.

The subpoenas were issued Wednesday by Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R., Calif.), who in April revealed that “dozens” of classified intelligence reports appeared to have improperly unmasked the names of Americans inadvertently spied on during foreign intelligence surveillance operations.


Nunes was sidelined from the committee’s Russia inquiry after a leftist media monitoring group alleged he disclosed classified information.

The House Ethics Committee has launched an inquiry into the allegation.

However, the ethics panel so far has ignored similar allegations lodged against the committee’s ranking member, Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.), who appears to have disclosed classified information in public discussion of former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s intercepted conversation with the Russian ambassador.

The committee wants the three agencies to disclose the details about the three former officials’ requests of the agencies to provide the hidden identities of the Americans who were caught in electronic surveillance.

The investigation into unmasking activities of Americans was initially part of the intelligence oversight panel’s investigation of Russian political influence operations during the 2016 election.


See the entire article below.



In addition to the subpoenas for unmasking request records, the committee also issued four related to the Russia aspect of the probe. They include notices to former White House National Security Adviser Flynn and Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal lawyer.

The issuing of subpoenas related to the disclosure of Americans’ identities are a sign that the probe into the potential political spying by the Obama administration has been elevated.

The NSA, FBI, and CIA have provided some cooperation to the committee but so far have not provided details sought by investigators. The subpoenas are meant to compel the three agencies’ cooperation on the matter.

Procedures for electronic intercepts that incidentally spy on Americans require blacking out the names of the Americans in a bid to protect privacy rights.

In cases usually limited to those involving terrorists or foreign intelligence operatives communicating with Americans, senior government officials can request that hidden names contained in raw transcripts be revealed in order to better understand the context of conversations. The unmasking is restricted to officials with a need to know and the dissemination of the revealed names is supposed to be limited within intelligence and government agencies.

House investigators believe the Obama administration sought to exploit the intelligence reports by first obtaining the masked names and then widely disseminating the reports in a bid to make identifying any leaks to the press more difficult.

“It’s clear that people on the Hill have found indications that high-level officials of the Obama administration weaponized American intelligence,” said a senior U.S. official.

The officials said the probe into possible political intelligence gathering by the Obama administration is now a separate inquiry from the Russia probe that has been dominating major news outlets’ coverage over the past several weeks.

By contrast, the improper unmasking activities have been largely ignored by most news media that have instead focused extensive coverage on the Russian collusion allegations.

The Senate Intelligence Committee is also investigating the matter but its inquiry appears to be limited to the Russia allegations. Former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by President Trump in part for continuing the Russian counterintelligence investigation, is set to testify before the Senate panel Thursday.

Trump, who has called the collusion allegations “fake news,” joined the fray on Thursday, tweeting, “The big story is the ‘unmasking and surveillance’ of people that took place during the Obama Administration.”

Indications of a political spying operation against Trump and his associates first surfaced in March when intelligence officials told the New York Times that during the last days of the Obama administration, White House officials had “scrambled to spread information” about Russian hacking and collusion with Trump campaign officials.

The March 1 report said American intelligence agencies had eavesdropped on communications of Russian officials, including some inside the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump aides.

House investigators’ concerns also were raised by earlier press disclosures revealing the contents of an intercepted phone call between Flynn and Moscow’s ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, discussing U.S. sanctions on Russia. Flynn later resigned as White House national security adviser as a result of the disclosures.

Power, the former UN ambassador targeted by the unmasking investigation, worked as an aide to Obama in the Senate and then on the White House National Security Council staff from 2009 to 2013. She became U.N. ambassador in 2013 and was a key figure in advocating U.S. military intervention in Libya.

The United Nations is a major U.S. intelligence target for the NSA, FBI, and CIA and investigators believe it is unusual for Power to have asked for the identities of Americans in late 2016 and early 2017.

Rice, the former White House adviser, earlier this month told CNN she would not testify before a Senate subcommittee investigating the Russia.

Rice called allegations she misused intelligence “absolutely false.”

“I did my job which was to protect the American people and I did it faithfully and to the best of my ability,” she said. “And never did I do anything that was untoward with respect to the intelligence I received.”

On May 23, Brennan revealed in House testimony that he had made unmasking requests during his tenure, but did not ask for the names of Americans in classified intelligence reports on Jan. 20, the day he left CIA.

“No, I was not in the agency on the last day I was employed,” Brennan said. “I definitely know that on the last day I was employed I definitely did not make such a request.”

Brennan, a career CIA analyst who also worked closely with Obama in the White House before moving to CIA, disclosed during his testimony that he requested that the FBI investigate Trump associates during the 2016 presidential campaign after intelligence reports indicated ties between campaign aides and Russians.

Critics have charged Brennan with politicizing the CIA during his tenure as director, limiting the agency’s espionage capabilities.

Brennan said he asked the FBI to investigate because he was worried by intelligence reports of contacts between Russians and Americans he did not identify in the May 23 testimony. “And so therefore I felt as though the FBI investigation was certainly well-founded and needed to look into those issues,” he said.

On March 20 during testimony before the House intelligence panel, then-FBI Director Comey and NSA Director Adm. Mike Rogers both testified they had no information supporting claims by Trump that the Obama administration had conducted political surveillance of him and his aides.

Days later, Nunes said he has been shown dozens of classified intelligence reports that appeared to contradict the two officials’ testimony.

“What I’ve read seems to be some level of surveillance activity, perhaps legal, but I don’t know that it’s right and I don’t know if the American people would be comfortable with what I’ve read,” Nunes said.

The intelligence reports included transcripts of communications, including communications directly from Trump based on a foreign electronic spying operation between November and January—the period when the transition team was operating, mainly from Trump’s New York residence, Trump Tower.

Nunes has said the apparent political spying activities were based on intercepts of a foreign target and were not related to the Russia inquiry.



About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in House Subpoenas Elevate Probe Into Improper Intelligence Surveillance and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to House Subpoenas Elevate Probe Into Improper Intelligence Surveillance

  1. Pamela says:

    “O what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”
    Sir Walter Scott

    This “Russia Probe” is all one big fractured fairy tale cooked up by the Democrats and their lap dogs in the crooked news media to keep the American people distracted while attempting to keep President Donald Trump, the first real leader we have had in a long, long time from making America great again.

    It’s not going to work. The only thing the Dems have succeeded in so far is showing America and the world what a bunch of first class, boob-brained, sore loser jackasses they are!


  2. Dave the Differentiator says:

    Just how ignorant are these liberals. Issue a Subpoenas to Trumps Attorney? Does Attorney-Client privilege still have any meaning?

    Of course, Hillary was never subject to the same standards nor was Obama. What is up with that?

    The so-called Russian connection does raise very difficult questions about America’s leaders disclosing information to foreign powers. Sadly, it appears to me that the focus is on the wrong people.

    Of course, the question of who, how and why was the President being spied upon by America’s various spy agencies.

    The corruption in Government needs to be shut down!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s