John Kerry: ‘There would have been no Paris Accord if there had been penalties: Which Paris Accord?

When John Kerry speaks and issues a remark like the one in the title above, he is clearly such an intellectual light weight, that one would wonder, was he talking about the other failed Paris Peace Accord in which The United States agreed to leave Vietnam with no peace and no honor?

 

 

The Paris Peace Accords of 1973 intended to establish peace in Vietnam and an end to the Vietnam War.

 

This picture taken in 1975 during the fall of Saigon by the late Dutch photographer Hugh Van Es shows evacuees mounting a staircase to board an American helicopter near the American Embassy in Saigon. Getty Image

 

It ended direct U.S. military combat and temporarily stopped the fighting between North and South Vietnam.

The governments of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, the Republic of Vietnam, and the United States, as well as the Provisional Revolutionary Government that represented indigenous South Vietnamese revolutionaries, signed the Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring Peace in Vietnam on January 27, 1973.

The agreement was not ratified by the United States Senate.
The negotiations that led to the accord began in 1968 after various lengthy delays. As a result of the accord, the International Control Commission was replaced by International Commission of Control and Supervision to fulfill the agreement.

The main negotiators of the agreement were United States National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger and Vietnamese politburo member Lê Đức Thọ; the two men were awarded the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts, although Lê Đức Thọ refused to accept it.

 

 

Kerry who has often been called dumber than a box of rocks fits the bill perfectly.

Only Hillary Clinton kept him from being the worst Secretary of State in modern history.

Yep, Kerry’s comments below will likely work, HA!

 

 

 

We hear the sky is falling now that Trump refuses to redistribute our wealth to the rest of the world via the Paris Accord.
 
But you know the drill.
 
John Kerry, the master negotiator that he is, rises up in his righteous anger yesterday.
 
Let’s just look how his mind worked when we first heard his words of wisdom on the agreement when it was first approved.
 
I am sure “Public Shaming” would have really done the trick in compliance.
 
It’s working great for his Iran deal he negotiated.

“So that is a serious form of enforcement, if you will, compliance.

But there is no penalty for it, obviously, but if there had been a penalty, we wouldn’t have been able to get an agreement.”

 

See the entire article below.

 

On December 14, 2015, I posted this and see if you can follow his logic.

Here Kerry opines on two insights on the Global Warming “agreement.”Kerry: Public Shaming is ‘Most Powerful Weapon in Many Ways’ to Enforce World Climate Agreement.

The other astute observation?

While discussing the global climate change agreement made in Paris over the weekend, Secretary of State John Kerry acknowledged on Fox News Sunday that there wouldn’t been an agreement at all if there were binding penalties for countries not meeting emissions standards.

Bonus: 

President Obama, Kerry said, was determined to “get an agreement that would move the world in the right direction.”

As such, Kerry said that the “best thing we can do” to get countries to reduce their carbon emissions was a “mandatory reporting requirement.”

In a bit of circular logic, Kerry said that countries would have to retool their reduction levels every five years to meet their commitments, but he couldn’t say there was anything beyond their own word to force them to so.

“The best thing we can do in an effort to try to change people’s thinking is to do this mandatory reporting requirement,” Kerry said.

“The mandatory reporting requirement has to be updated every five years.

Every five years, it is mandatory that countries retool their reduction levels in order to meet the demands of meeting the curve of reduction to which they have committed.

So that is a serious form of enforcement, if you will, compliance. But there is no penalty for it, obviously, but if there had been a penalty, we wouldn’t have been able to get an agreement.”

 

 

THE END

Advertisements

About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement, Obama and the liberal media.
This entry was posted in John Kerry: ‘There would have been no Paris Accord if there had been penalties: Which Paris Accord? and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to John Kerry: ‘There would have been no Paris Accord if there had been penalties: Which Paris Accord?

  1. John Backstabbing Kerry

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s