Fearing Trump’s next move, liberals urge Supreme Court conservative Kennedy to stay

 

Justice Anthony  Kennedy a conservative?  Hardly!

 

A close examination of his decisions below clearly demonstrates that he voted his conscious and followed the U.S. Constitution to the best of his ability as he swore to do upon being sworn into the highest court in the land.

 

Of course, the progressive socialists’ don’t want him to leave he isn’t a liberal demagogue like Sotomayor and Keagan.

Coming up on his 81st birthday in July, perhaps he has served his country long enough and would like to retire and enjoy the rest of his life with his family.

Why Supreme Court Justices in the United States are appointed for life. (Source)

 

 

Reuters

By Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung
 
June 1, 2017
 
WASHINGTON

Liberal activists are urging U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, a conservative with whom they often disagree, to put off any thought of retirement, fearing President Donald Trump would replace him with a jurist further to the right.

The Liberal Democrats’ keep-Kennedy campaign, being pursued publicly and privately, reflects how powerless they have become against the Republican president when it comes to high court vacancies since the Senate in April reduced the vote tally needed to confirm a Supreme Court nomination to 51 from 60.

 

It also shows how big the stakes are for both sides in any decision that Kennedy, who turns 81 in July, makes about his future on the court.

If he were to retire, Trump would have a historic opportunity to recast the court in a more conservative posture, possibly for decades to come.

Some former Kennedy clerks have said he is thinking about retirement. He has declined to comment on his plans, despite requests from many media outlets including Reuters.

Right now, Kennedy “is the most important man in America.

He is the vote that swings the court on the most important cases that reach it,” said Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a left-leaning think tank.

Nominated by Republican President Ronald Reagan in 1987 to a lifetime court seat, Kennedy has been a crucial swing vote on the nine-member court for more than a decade.

On most issues, such as campaign finance and religious rights, he has voted with fellow conservatives.

He also voted with the minority to strike down the 2010 Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.

But on gay rights and abortion, he has sided with the court’s four liberals.

If he stays in his post, the court’s long-standing ideological balance will be preserved. If he quits, Trump could replace him with someone who tilts further right, giving conservatives a solid five-vote majority.

Wydra and other liberals are lionizing Kennedy and his legacy in the media.

Some are reaching out to former Kennedy clerks and others who know him, asking them to urge him not to retire, said Michele Jawando, a legal advocate at the Center for American Progress think tank in Washington.

One former Kennedy clerk confirmed being asked to urge him to stay on and said other clerks had asked him to do so.

Other clerks said they had not been approached by liberal activists.

See the entire article below.

 

SOLE TRIUMPH

Since he took office in January, Trump’s only significant domestic policy achievement has been winning Senate confirmation of his nominee to the high court, Neil Gorsuch, a former Kennedy clerk.

Gorsuch replaced a fellow conservative, Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016. The Gorsuch confirmation did not shift the court’s ideological balance, but it did trigger a change in the Senate rules for considering Supreme Court nominees.

To get Gorsuch confirmed, Republicans exercised the “nuclear option,” ending Democrats’ ability to use a procedural maneuver called a filibuster to block a final vote on a Supreme Court nominee. As a result, Republicans, with a 52-48 Senate majority, can now confirm any future nominee without Democratic support.

In another handicap, liberal groups said they lacked the money to sway public opinion via TV and online ads, unlike conservative groups that had $10 million to back Gorsuch.

In view of those disadvantages, People for the American Way, another liberal group, issued a report earlier this month outlining the impact of a Kennedy retirement, describing it as a “disaster for the rights of all Americans.”

Liberals want in part to protect the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion. As a candidate, Trump said he would appoint court justices who would vote to overturn the decision.

Perhaps seeking to reassure Kennedy that his legacy is in safe hands, Trump has consistently praised the justice. At Gorsuch’s swearing-in in April, Trump called Kennedy a “great man of outstanding accomplishment.”

Trump and other Republicans have said they have heard rumors that Kennedy might retire, but have not publicly urged him to.

The president has vowed to pick his next nominee the same way he chose Gorsuch, from a list of contenders he made public before the election.

Among contenders viewed as possible Kennedy replacements are federal appeals court judges Raymond Kethledge and Thomas Hardiman, conservative lawyer and former Solicitor General Paul Clement and Brett Kavanaugh, a judge on the federal appeals court in Washington, according to a person with knowledge of the nomination process.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley in Washington and Andrew Chung in New York; Additional reporting by Julia Edwards Ainsley in Washington; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Peter Cooney)


 

Advertisements

About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement, Obama and the liberal media.
This entry was posted in liberals urge Supreme Court conservative Kennedy to stay and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Fearing Trump’s next move, liberals urge Supreme Court conservative Kennedy to stay

  1. Pingback: The Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Ohio’s Clean Voter Rolls Case Soros Watch

  2. Dave the Differentiator says:

    Just exactly how corrupt can the Liberals be?

    The Conservatives allowed Obama to appoint two extremely liberal Justices. Both Sotomayor and Keagan made a point about their being female and Sotomayor referred to herself as a Latino Lady in her confirmation hearings.

    If a Republican was quoted as using the RACE CARD he would be tarred and feathered by the Progressives.

    The entire Circus in Washington DC needs to be fixed and soon.

    Trump had no idea of how deep the swamp was in DC!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s