What if our scientific assumptions about outer space have been wrong

“This was completely unexpected,” Bolton said.


“You have a deep band of ammonia that goes from the top of Jupiter as deep as we can see.


It goes down to 350 kilometers (217 miles) because that’s the limit of where we’re looking.”

Space Flight Now

May 27, 2017

If Albert Gore Junior had done the same we wouldn’t still have druids and socialists running around selling so-called climate exchange credits.

The ammonia band may penetrate even deeper inside Jupiter, Bolton said.

This image shows Jupiter’s south pole, as seen by NASA’s Juno spacecraft from an altitude of 32,000 miles (52,000 kilometers). Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Betsy Asher Hall/Gervasio Robles

The first months of observations of the solar system’s biggest planet from NASA’s Juno spacecraft have revealed huge swirling polar cyclones, previously undetected structures and motions beneath Jupiter’s distinctive clouds, and the first evidence for what lies at the core of the gas giant, scientists said Thursday.


There was plenty scientists did not know about the planet when the Juno spacecraft left Earth in 2011, and the probe has sought answers to questions about Jupiter’s interior, magnetic field, auroras and radiation belts, and used a visible light camera to capture the first direct views of the poles.

“The general theme of our discoveries is really how different Jupiter looks from what we expected,” said Scott Bolton, Juno’s principal investigator at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio. “Juno, in many ways, is looking inside Jupiter for the first time, close-up and personal.”

Since Juno arrived at its destination July 4, 2016, to wrap up a five-year interplanetary trip, the spacecraft, built and operated by Lockheed Martin, has circled Jupiter six times in an oval-shaped loop that extends a few million miles at its farthest point. Each lap takes more than 53 days, and Juno speedily skirts within 3,000 miles (5,000 kilometers) Jupiter’s cloud tops at closest approach.

Juno’s science instruments collect most of their data when the orbiter is near Jupiter, taking pictures, measuring plasma and electrons, and probing deep inside the planet to find out what is hidden under its cloudy veneer.

Many scientists thought Jupiter was “relatively boring and uniform” inside before Juno arrived, Bolton said.

“For decades, scientists have assumed this, that if we drop below the cloud tops, below where the sunlight reaches, that pretty much Jupiter was all uniform inside, and it really didn’t matter where you looked, it would all look the same,” Bolton said Thursday. “And what we’re finding is anything but that is the truth. It’s very different and very complex.”


Juno’s microwave radiometer, an instrument similar to those aboard climate satellites looking down on Earth, gathers sounding measurements to peer below the red-orange tapestry of Jupiter’s cloud tops.

The radiometer is tuned to six wavelengths, detecting thermal radiation emitted from different layers of the atmosphere from the storm clouds and jet streams to as deep as 300 miles, or about 500 kilometers.

Going into Juno’s mission, scientists anticipated Jupiter’s atmosphere to be relatively consistent deeper than 60 miles, or 100 kilometers.

Instead, Juno’s microwave radiometer discovered a belt of ammonia around Jupiter’s equator and variations in ammonia abundances at other latitudes extending deep into the planet’s atmosphere.


“What this is telling us is that Jupiter is not very well-mixed,” Bolton said. “It’s not all uniform inside. The idea of, once you drop below the sunlight, that everything would all be uniform, boring and mixed up was completely wrong. It’s actually very different depending on where you look.”

The findings suggest more ammonia farther down in Jupiter’s atmosphere, and the ammonia detections appear to have no relationship with the zones and belts of clouds visible in pictures from space.

“That’s really going to force us to rethink not only how Jupiter works, but how do we explore Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune if they are highly variable like this?” Bolton said.

Other parts of Juno’s scientific sensor suite are mapping Jupiter’s gravity field to learn about the heart of the planet.



“When we went to go measure the gravity field, what we were really looking for was the core — whether there was a compact core or no core,” Bolton said.

“Instead, what we found was that it really looks fuzzy. There may be a core there, but it’s very big, and it may be partially dissolved. We’re studying that, but that came as a big surprise to us that there was no core.”

Theories about Jupiter’s core before Juno arrived predominately predicted the planet either had a small, dense rocky core between one and 10 times as massive as Earth or no core at all, scientists said.

“Most scientists were in one camp or the other, and what we found was really neither was true,” Bolton said.

“There may be a little bit of a compact core, but there may be layers there, and there seems to be a fuzzy core that may be much larger than anybody had anticipated.

“The gravity data that we’ve gotten thus far is not really consistent with just a small compact core or zero core, but it is somewhat consistent with a large fuzzy core that may be partially dissolved,” Bolton said. “It’s also consistent, maybe, with some deep motions, or zonal winds and things like that … dictating the interior of Jupiter’s dynamics, which are very different from historically models have assumed.”

Jupiter’s intense magnetic field, the strongest of any planet in the solar system, has also been interrogated by Juno, which has a magnetometer mounted at the end of one of the craft’s three solar array wings.


NASA’s Juno spacecraft is investigating the structure and convection of Jupiter’s interior by reaching through the meteorological layer, the top layer of the planet’s atmosphere. A possible inner “rock” core is shown, surrounded by a metallic hydrogen envelope (shown in blue) and the outer envelope of molecular hydrogen (shown in brown), all hidden beneath the visible cloud deck. Juno’s gravity field data will reveal new clues about Jupiter’s core. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI

Jack Connerney, Juno’s deputy principal investigator at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, described the magnetometer as like a “fancy compass” that can measure the direction and strength of Jupiter’s magnetic field.

Juno has come closer to Jupiter than any mission before, and proximity yields better magnetic field measurements, Connerney said.


See the entire article below.


“What we found in our first few passes is that the magnetic field was both stronger than we expected where we expected it to be strong, and it was weaker than we expected where we expected it to be weak,” Connerney said. “In other words, it evidenced a dramatic spatial variation that we were not quite aware of previously.”

The fluctuations detected by Juno suggest the spacecraft is unexpectedly close to the magnetic field’s source, or dynamo.

Scientists thought the magnetic field might be generated in a global pool of liquid metallic hydrogen in Jupiter’s middle layer somewhere between the center of the planet and the atmosphere. Squeezed at extreme pressure, the deep layer of hydrogen is liquified and conducts electricity.

The magnetic field expands outward from Jupiter and is blown back by the solar wind like a comet’s tail. The magnetic field bubble, called a magnetosphere, is similar to one around Earth, but Jupiter’s is so immense it would be the size of the full moon in the sky, if it was visible with the naked eye.

Juno’s observations “might mean that the dynamo is above that metallic hydrogen region,” Connerney said, perhaps in an envelope of molecular hydrogen.

An infrared camera and ultraviolet spectrometer aboard the Juno spacecraft have been looking at Jupiter’s powerful polar auroras, producing another set of observations that surprised scientists.

It turns out some of the auroral light emissions seem to be produced by electrons streaming out of Jupiter’s atmosphere, not by charged particles riding field lines into the planet, as is the case with Earth’s auroras. One of Juno’s instruments, an electron detector, found particles moving upward as the orbiter soared over Jupiter’s south pole.

According to Connerney, the electrons are probably drawn out of the planet along the same field lines scientists thought would see the particles into Jupiter.

“As they’re leaving, they collide with hydrogen molecules and excite ultraviolet emissions,” Connerney said.

“It’s a 180-degree turnabout from the way we were thinking about those emissions prior to the Juno observations.”

Juno’s ultraviolet spectrograph recorded this image of Jupiter’s southern aurora. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SWRI

NASA’s Cassini spacecraft, in the final months of its mission, is now orbiting Saturn on a trajectory similar to Juno’s. Bolton said scientists are eager to compare observations from the two craft to compare the solar system’s two largest planets.

“Cassini doesn’t have the exact same kind of instruments we have, and of course, we’re tuned to do this interior research, but it has a lot of great instruments that can learn a lot about the interior and other things that it can do close-up,” said Bolton, who is also a member of the Cassini science team.

“We’re both trying to figure out our data from our own planets at the moment, but eventually we will compare, and of course, that’s the key to scientific advancement — comparative study,” Bolton said. “So being able to compare Cassini’s measurements at Saturn and Jupiter’s measurements by Juno, we will really be able to advance our understanding how these giant planets work.”

Juno’s camera has scanned Jupiter during each pass over the planet’s poles, catching dozens of swirling storms in the act, some the size of Earth.

The Juno team relies on amateur observers and image processors logged in to the mission’s website to crunch raw views from JunoCam and create colorful mosaics.

“What you see are incredible, complex features,” Bolton said. “These cyclones and anticyclones all over the poles. That wasn’t really expected.

“The bluish hue is probably real,” he said of one south pole mosaic. “And the biggest feature is that Jupiter, from the poles, doesn’t look anything like it does from the equator.

“Our usual picture of Jupiter has zones and belts, the Great Red Spot, and you see these stripes, and that’s the Jupiter we’ve all known and grown to love,” Bolton said. “When you look from the pole, it looks totally different. If you looked at this picture, and somebody had shown it to you a few years ago, I don’t think anybody would have guessed this is Jupiter.”

Mission managers tacked on the JunoCam imager to the spacecraft’s instrument package after NASA selected Juno for development in 2005. JunoCam was not originally part of the Juno mission, but officials added the camera as a public outreach tool.

Scientists said JunoCam’s imagery adds context to their data analysis work, but it also engages a broader community of professional and amateur scientists, space enthusiasts and artists.




About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in What if our scientific assumptions about outer space have been wrong and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What if our scientific assumptions about outer space have been wrong

  1. Al Gore is right. We are on the down side of the warming. Where there is an up there will always be a down. Look at the pattern stored in the ice history in the glaciers before people. The up and down were equal. We have a higher up. . That means we will have a lower down.


  2. Pingback: What if our scientific assumptions about outer space have been wrong | zooforyou

  3. Al Gore is right. We are on the down side of the warming. Where there is an up there will always be a down. Look at the pattern stored in the ice history in the glaciers before people. The up and down were equal. We have a higher up. . That means we will have a lower down. People got how the universe started all wrong. It is in the Bible in plain sight. People allowed the Devil to blind them. God set the stars in the universe where he wanted them to be. Satan made them explode when Humanity fell.


    • JCscuba says:

      Suffice to say if a guy won’t allow questions when he gives his propaganda laden speeches and will not talk to reporters about his global hoax he’s not only a fool but an idiot.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s