By Jim Campbell
February 28, 2017
Crossing the Racial Divide
Wouldn’t it be great if President Donald Trump would be the first president to lead by example and cut the political correctness nonsense?
The origins of political correctness come from cultural Marxism.
It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms.
It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms.
It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I.
If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies.
The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble.
Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment.
Below: Police Chief tells the blunt truth about policing in black neighborhoods.
That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.
Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole. (Source)
Enough with the divisiveness, Obama played that card far to0 hard.
Most black Obama voters, have never to Africa and would likely be unable to find it on the map.
Why not be called Americans?
This month, President Donald Trump signed three executive orders that will intensify the criminalization of communities of color, under the false premise of the need to increase “law and order.” Leveraging public perception that crime is on the rise and the backlash against protesters, immigrants and grassroots efforts such as the Black Lives Matter movement, these executive orders ramp up policing efforts and federalize protections for police. Executive actions like these only worsen the continued criminalization of communities of color.
First, the Presidential Executive Order on Preventing Violence Against Federal State, Tribal and Local Law Enforcement Officers focuses on increasing enforcement of existing and new laws and strategies that will punish those who commit or attempt to commit crimes of violence against law enforcement.
It also states that the executive branch will develop strategies to fulfill this goal, including new legislation to define new crimes, increase penalties, and establish new mandatory minimums for existing crimes against law enforcement.
This may seem reasonable.
There should be penalties for committing crimes against the police.
Yet as Jonathan Blanks, a research associate at the conservative Cato Institute, stated: “Violence against police officers is taken seriously in every policing jurisdiction in America.”
Blanks continued, “Keeping law enforcement officers safe is a noble goal.
But there is little evidence that new and harsher federal criminal laws will do anything at all to make American police safer.”
The Propaganda starts immediately below.Second, the Presidential Executive Order on Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking’s stated goal is to strengthen federal law regarding transnational criminal organizations and related entities that are engaged in crimes such as trafficking humans, drugs, wildlife,and weapons, as well as concealing earnings from illegal activity.
It calls for the swift removal of foreign nationals and prosecution of ancillary offenses like immigration fraud and visa fraud. (And the problem with that would be?)
Black communities, immigrant communities, and other marginalized groups already face harsh penalties for nonviolent crimes; the same happens with crimes of survival such as visa fraud and selling drugs.
Furthermore, the right-leaning Center for Immigration Studies has reported many times that immigrants commit proportionately no more than, and possibly even fewer, crimes than native-born citizens.
Reinforcing existing laws that already disenfranchise communities of color will have a very real and devastating impact on families across the country.
It’s far above the writers pay grade to fathom, with all the black hostility, law abiding black citizens stuck in ghettos are not getting the police enforcement they deserve and badly need.
Third, the Executive Order on a Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety calls on the Attorney General to establish such a force.
It posits a need to enforce laws and develop policies that address “illegal immigration,” drug trafficking and violent crime.
The task force is directed to develop strategies to reduce crime, identify problems with existing laws that make them ineffective and evaluate the adequacy of crime-related data collection. Said whom?
A heightened focus on undocumented immigrants does little to address actual dangerous crimes, since, again, undocumented immigrants do not commit disproportionate numbers of crimes. Policies like this one actually harm crime victims rather than protect them. For example, an immigrant domestic violence survivor was recently detained at an
Policies like this one actually harm crime victims rather than protect them. For example, an immigrant domestic violence survivor was recently detained at an
For example, an immigrant domestic violence survivor was recently detained at an El Paso court while obtaining a protective order. This is the type of action that can stop a victim from seeking the help they need and deserve.
This is the type of action that can stop a victim from seeking the help they need and deserve.
Those looking to help mitigate the damage these executive orders stand to do should call their Senators in support of the End Racial and Religious Profiling Act (ERRPA). The act aims to establish a prohibition on racial and religious profiling, mandating training for federal law enforcement officials on profiling and requiring local, state, federal and tribal law enforcement agencies to collect data on all investigatory activities, routine and spontaneous. Democratic Senator Ben Cardin has just reintroduced
The act aims to establish a prohibition on racial and religious profiling, mandating training for federal law enforcement officials on profiling and requiring local, state, federal and tribal law enforcement agencies to collect data on all investigatory activities, routine and spontaneous. Democratic Senator Ben Cardin has just reintroduced
Democratic Senator Ben Cardin has just reintroduced ERRPA this Congress. He’s looking for co-sponsorship.
These orders can, and will, be used to further criminalize and harm communities of color. They return us to the failed policies of zero tolerance and mandatory minimums that have led to the mass incarceration of people of color even as
They return us to the failed policies of zero tolerance and mandatory minimums that have led to the mass incarceration of people of color even as crime rates and deadly violence against police officers have declined. Criminalizing marginalized communities only further legitimizes continued over-policing and violence under the guise of protecting law enforcement.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that the immediately above written by Casey Harden, Interim CEO of YWCA USA has already been brainwashed and has no understanding on who to bridge the racial divide.
JCscuba
Jim Campbell's 