The good the bad and the ugly.
Obama’s plan to have all recipients of Obama Care microchipped was destroyed immediately, by those who were sane in congress.
Imagine the number of lawsuits that would be filed if this were to be legislated in the year 2017.
Despite the slick sales pitch in the video below, and no, Brian Williams had nothing more to do with it than introduce the concept, there can be little doubt that the risks outweigh the benefits.
Here’s another twist, if you have noticed, new charge cards being issued or replaced have a chip imbedded in it..
If one doesn’t choose to have the government know from whom your buy, what you buy and when you by it, go with cash.
Soon cash will no longer be used.
Makes BitCoin sound better all the time.
Advantages and disadvantages of using BitCoin. (Source)
After taking the time to read, Area 51 by Annie Jacobsen who took 7 years to write her book following the release of once-classified documents, we would be insane to ever trust our government on anything.
Who is the government?
Elected and unelected zealots from both sides of the aisle who for the most part more interested in their own financial gain than helping their constituents.
Does anyone seriously believe that upon forced implantation, the will not gather DNA samples from the blood resulting from the insertion?
For his part, Trump is too wealthy to be bought and paid for.
If he is kept from blocking this type of nonsense and implementing his plans to restore America to its rightful place in the world, the ball game may be over folks.
CARSON CITY —
State Sen. Becky Harris said a bill to prohibit forced microchipping of people (Source) is not as far-fetched as it might seem because it happens in some places around the world.
Senate Bill 109 would make it a Class C felony to require someone to be implanted with a radio frequency identifier, such as microchips placed in pets.
The idea for the bill came from a constituent, the Las Vegas Republican said.
“As I began to look into the issue, I was surprised with the merit that I believe the issue warrants,” Harris told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday.
She said sales of radio frequency identifiers are escalating around the world, and a company in Australia as of June 2016 sold more than 10,000 implantable chips with do-it-yourself kits.
“Each kit costs about $100 and includes a tag and an injection tool,” Harris said.
The Wall Street Journal has reported an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 chips have been sold globally, she said.
Harris said the technology is used by companies in Belgium and Sweden to identify employees.
“It’s done under the idea to unlock doors or use copy machines or maybe pay for lunch, you could use your hand,” she said.
Besides privacy concerns, Harris said the concept raises ethical questions, such as who owns the chip or the information contained on it, and how does someone get “de-chipped” if they are no longer employed by the company that required it. She also wondered if a chip could be hacked to harass or stalk someone.
Harris said the Nevada bill is modeled after legislation passed by at least 10 other states.
Please see the entire article below.
“It wouldn’t prohibit the voluntary decision of a person to be microchipped,” she said, adding that a nightclub in Europe offers microchipping to customers so the establishment can provide tailored service.
There was no total opposition to the bill, though some witnesses said the technology could help patients with dementia.
“Some Alzheimer’s patients wander away,” said Jonathan Friedrich of Las Vegas, adding the technology could be used to help find them quickly.
State Sen. Don Gustavson questioned whether military pilots are microchipped so rescuers can find them if aircraft crash or are shot down.
Harris said she would check with military officials.
No action was taken on the bill by the committee.