Obama’s Israel Surprise?

crew-2231211On Israel, Obama has no clue what he’s talking about.


But the same could be said about anything he must become involved.

Obama has sent mixed messages to Israel and it’s time he stops acting like a fool. (Source)



Meanwhile,he negotiated with Iran, if it could be called that allowing Secretary of State, John Kerry pay billions to Iran and now are enriching fissionable material.

Fears grow of a final day’s presidential ambush at the U.N.



November 1, 2016


Foundation for Defense of Democracies Vice President Jonathan Schanzer on a White House plan that would kill the peace process. Photo credit: Zuma Press.

Israeli diplomats gird for the possibility that President Obama may try to force a diplomatic resolution for Israel and the Palestinians at the United Nations. The White House has been unusually tight-lipped about what, if anything, it might have in mind. But our sources say the White House has asked the State Department to develop an options menu for the President’s final weeks.

One possibility would be to sponsor, or at least allow, a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlement construction, perhaps alongside new IRS regulations revoking the tax-exempt status of people or entities involved in settlement building.

The Administration vetoed such a resolution in 2011 on grounds that it “risks hardening the position of both sides,” which remains true.

See the entire article below.

But condemning the settlements has always been a popular way of scoring points against the Jewish state, not least at the State Department, and an antisettlement resolution might burnish Mr. Obama’s progressive brand for his post-presidency.

Mr. Obama may also seek formal recognition of a Palestinian state at the Security Council. This would run afoul of Congress’s longstanding view that “Palestine” does not have the internationally recognized attributes of statehood, including a defined territory and effective government, though Mr. Obama could overcome the objection through his usual expedient of an executive action, thereby daring the next President to reverse him.

Both actions would be a boon to the bullies in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement, while also subjecting Israeli citizens and supporters abroad to new and more aggressive forms of legal harassment. It could even criminalize the Israeli army—and every reservist who serves in it—on the theory that it is illegally occupying a foreign state. Does Mr. Obama want to be remembered as the President who criminalized Israeli citizenship?

The worst option would be an effort to introduce a resolution at the U.N. Security Council setting “parameters” for a final settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. The French have been eager to do this for some time, and one option for the Administration would be to let the resolution pass simply by refusing to veto it. Or the U.S. could introduce the resolution itself, all the better to take credit for it.

As the old line has it, this would be worse than a crime—it would be a blunder. U.S. policy has long and wisely been that only Israelis and Palestinians can work out a peace agreement between themselves and that efforts to impose one would be counterproductive. Whatever parameters the U.N. established would be unacceptable to any Israeli government, left or right, thereby destroying whatever is left of a peace camp in Israel.

The Palestinians would seize on those parameters as their birthright, making it impossible for any future Palestinian leader to bargain part of them away in a serious negotiation. Arab states would find their diplomatic hands tied, making it impossible to serve as useful intermediaries between Jerusalem and Ramallah. It could refreeze relations with Israel even as they finally seem to have thawed.

President Obama may be the last man on earth to get the memo, but after decades of fruitless efforts to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict it might be wiser for the U.S. to step back until the Palestinians recognize that peace cannot be imposed from the outside. If Mr. Obama is still seeking a Middle East legacy at this late stage in his presidency, his best move is do nothing to make it worse.



About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. This site covers politics with a fiscally conservative, deplores Sharia driven Islam, and uses lots of humor to spiceup your day. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else. Please subscribe at the top right and pass this along to your friends, Thank's I'm J.C. and I run the circus
This entry was posted in Obama’s Israel Surprise? and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Obama’s Israel Surprise?

  1. Davethe Differientator says:

    The solution may be to destroy the Quran!

    This action would remove the Jihad for Muslims to kill Jews and allow for some concessions.

    If one of the basic planks in a platform is to kill your opponent, then the chances for peace would appear to me to be dead! (pun intended)

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Pingback: Obama’s Israel Surprise? « Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

  3. Blessed B. says:

    Israel and Palestine have already formed a peace agreement. Remember they met at a meeting in Egypt….without any American intervention…and both have now relative peace.

    Both sides realized that the USA had no intentions of allowing peace between Israel and Palestine…both were being lied to about the other to stir up tensions, not to calm them down. Once the USA was not allowed into the Peace negotiations and talks in Egypt, Israel and Palestine have realized that Peace can be achieved between them if communications are open.

    Liked by 1 person

    • JCscuba says:

      That may well be Noralee, but they are still firing missiles at each other. It’s not a place on either side I would choose to live. Thanks for your comments, well said. xoxo J.C.


  4. Just Simply Linda says:

    {{{sticking our noses in place we ought no too}}}–I have also read, JC that Obama will have outright wars going on in Africa before Jan. We have a friend who serves in the military and was just sent in secrecy to somewhere in Africa.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.