Sniper takes out ISIS executioner from a mile away





A sharpshooter killed a top ISIS executioner and three other jihadists with a single bullet from nearly a mile away — just seconds before the fiend was set to burn 12 hostages alive with a flamethrower, according to a new report.


The British Special Air Service marksman turned one of the most hated terrorists in Syria into a fireball by using a Barett .50-caliber rifle to strike a fuel tank affixed to the jihadi’s back, the UK’s Daily Star reported Sunday.

The pack exploded, killing the sadistic terrorist and three of his flunkies, who were supposed to film the execution, last month, the paper said.

The ISIS butcher — who reportedly delighted in burning hostages alive — had been on a US “kill list” for several months, sources told the paper, which did not identify the sniper or the executioner.



About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in Sniper takes out ISIS executioner from a mile away and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Sniper takes out ISIS executioner from a mile away

  1. drartaud says:

    It’s amazing that someone can wear the ghillie suit and sit on a street in a flower pot unnoticed.

    BUSHMAN PRANK | Bush Man Scare Prank #302

    Sniper School at Fort Benning: Ghillie Suit

    On the other hand, isis experimented with scary snowman camouflage suits for desert warfare but were unsuccessful.

    Scary Snowman Halloween Scare Prank 2014


  2. Just Simply Linda says:

    We were just discussing this. Cool beans.😆


  3. drartaud says:

    In addition (I have a comment pending moderation, it has links, thems the rulz) there is a disturbing trend in the media to refer to rifles as “long range” weapons. Duh! I think we’re seeing the nascent stages of the new narrative, that we don’t need rifles, just a double barrel shotgun.

    Buy a Shotgun (song) by Flying Robots

    12 guage vs AR 15 the Biden Challenge


    • JCscuba says:

      I don’t happen to share your observation. Just like in Vietnam, soldiers felt their M-16’s were too unreliable bought grease guns, AKA Tommy Guns, Not saying Shot guns to have a special place for getting up close and personal.


      • drartaud says:

        I’m not sure which observation you don’t share. The media has been referring to rifles as “long range” weapons for a little while now, adding a description to a word that’s implicit. I think it signals a change in the game to where the media will push the lie that the 2nd Amendment is about home defence (where shotguns would be useful) and not about the ability for the people to rise up against tyranny (where shotguns would be inadequate over long ranges).

        The “buy a shotgun” is Joe Biden’s statement, not mine.

        There is no question that the recoil of a shotgun is considerably more than an AR-15. Some lunatic journalist discussed the trauma he had in firing an AR-15.

        Little girl 7 schools New York liberal writer on how to be a man shooting an AR-15

        This resulted in a series of parody videos making fun of the journalist.

        Video Mocking Journalist Who Claimed PTSD From AR-15 Goes Viral

        Actually, the M-16 was designed for use with IMR powder, the original design said not to use ball powder. When issued, the govt used ball powder, go figure. There are several discussions on powder at the following link, this is the one on IMR vs Ball.

        ….the rifle was configured for a particular grade of IMR extruded powder but DuPont had difficulty providing it in quantity. So they went to Winchester Ball powder. It met specs as to chamber pressure and muzzle velocity but had two faults.

        Its pressure curve differed from the IMR, with a higher port pressure. This gave a higher cyclic rate in full auto and even in semiauto kind of banged things around. A beefed up buffer was required.

        Ball powder of the 1960s contained calcium carbonate (lime) to neutralize residual nitric and sulfuric acids from the first steps of manufacture. This caked up the gas tube badly; first source of complaint against Direct Impingement. (Ball powders had worked just fine in M1 Garand and M1 Carbine during the War…..)

        Winchester reduced, eventually eliminated the lime but the damage was done. People of that generation did not trust the M16.

        As always, best regards.


  4. SAH says:

    High marks for our British friends! Actions like this can turn ISIS into compost!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Dave the Differentiator says:

    The so-called Allies have the fire power to kill all of the Muslims when they want to act AND get permission to act.

    With Obama fading out, I believe that ISIS and other Muslims hate groups will be exterminated with extreme prejudice!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.