DNC Chair Wasserman Shultz slams the door on more Democrat Debates

crew-22312Of course she would, Shultz is the consummate suck up to Hillary Clinton and her cabal of dangerous idiots. 


Call it if you like, leaving a very big decision to a very small mind.

While many Democrats have jumped ship, leaving her to guide her own life boat, Debbie is not among them.

Debbie is busy shielding Hillary from the troublesome issue of facing those questions that will always come up in the debates.

Sooner or later the first debate will come and it may well be the last one in which Hillary participates.


hqdefaultIn reality they view her as a Pit Bull with A.I.D.S.

DNC chair closes door on more debates


Johnny Easily

September 10, 2015.


Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is closing the door on adding more Democratic presidential debates, and says that a controversial clause penalizing debbie-wasserman-schultz-moron-award-winnercandidates for participating in unsanctioned debates will stand.

Speaking at a breakfast with reporters hosted by The Christian Science Monitor, Wasserman Schultz said the debate schedule was final and there would be no changes.
“We’re not changing the process. We’re having six debates,” said Wasserman Schultz, who has been under fire from several Democratic presidential candidates over the debates.

“The candidates will be uninvited from subsequent debates if they accept an invitation to anything outside of the six sanctioned debates.”

In recent weeks, pressure has been building on the DNC to grow the debate schedule. The national party has sanctioned six debates, a dramatic cutback from 2008, when there were about two-dozen.

Democratic presidential candidate Martin O’Malley has been railing against the national party, calling the debate process “rigged” and claiming that the DNC was “facilitating a coronation” for front-runner Hillary Clinton.



If looks could kill, Hillary would have shot her way into a win over Obama in the 2007 debates.   Here Obama asks her how she would maintain the solvency of Social Security.

Of course she had no clue, other than to continue raiding other departments within the federal government.

“Every day someone is going to say something about my intentions, but I have a party to run,” Wasserman Schultz said.

“I have to simultaneously make sure that we’re getting ready to make sure the party is prepared to support our eventual nominee, and at the same time manage a neutral primary nominating process, which I’m going to do.

I’ll make decisions that will make some people happy and some people unhappy. I can’t worry about that.”

O’Malley’s lawyer has challenged the legality of the DNC’s “exclusivity clause,” which states that any candidate who participates in an unsanctioned debate will be barred from attending future sanctioned debates.

Entire article below.


The former Maryland governor is urging his supporters to rally outside DNC headquarters next week along with an outside group called #AllowDebate that has the same aim.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has also argued that the party needs to hold more debates, as have prominent party officials and activists in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Late Wednesday, two DNC officers publicly rebuked the national party’s debate schedule.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, both of whom are DNC vice-chairs, wrote a joint Facebook post urging the national party to add more debates and to drop the threat of exclusion for candidates that participate in unsanctioned debates.
Wasserman Schultz on Thursday said she consulted with past chairmen and current DNC vice-chairs before settling on the number of debates.

She defended the schedule, saying six debates offered plenty of opportunity for the candidates to distinguish themselves, and that too many debates would be a burden on the candidates, pulling them off the campaign trail and eating up valuable resources and time.

Wasserman Schultz noted that in addition to the debates, there have already been at least a dozen other forums the candidates have been invited to appear at, and that at least a half-dozen more have been planned.

“You can see that our candidates are gaining steam on their own,” she said. “Look at the crowds Bernie Sanders is drawing. We have not had any debates yet and Bernie Sanders has found a way to really catch fire with our base.”

Regarding the exclusivity clause, Wasserman Schultz said it was to ensure the “debate process doesn’t get out of control.” She cited 2008, when the party sanctioned six debates but the candidates participated in about two dozen.

“If you don’t have the national party put a reasonable number of debates on the schedule and insist that the number is adhered to, it starts to spiral out of control and the entire contest becomes built around the debate schedule,” she said.

About JCscuba

I am firmly devoted to bringing you the truth and the stories that the mainstream media ignores. Together we can restore our constitutional republic to what the founding fathers envisioned and fight back against the progressive movement. Obama nearly destroyed our country economically, militarily coupled with his racism he set us further on the march to becoming a Socialist State. Now it's up to President Trump to restore America to prominence. Republicans who refuse to go along with most of his agenda RINOs must be forced to walk the plank, they are RINOs and little else.
This entry was posted in DNC Chair Wasserman Shultz slams the door on more Democrat Debates and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to DNC Chair Wasserman Shultz slams the door on more Democrat Debates

  1. Dave the Differentiator says:

    Hello, who picks the candidates – the PEOPLE.

    This idiot needs to be put in jail for violating the free speech clause of the U. S. Constitution.

    OF COURSE, every time Hillary makes a statement she creates more doubt about her capabilities to be in politics!


    • JCscuba says:

      Debby Couldn’t do Dallas even if she payed them and not the other way around, she is clearly the face of the DNC, and they couldn’t have picked a better poster child. She does look like a donkey’s ass doesn’t she?


  2. Jim, it’s not nice to pick on the disadvantaged! TEEEHEEEHEEE!


  3. JCscuba says:

    Putting them into a wood pullper would work after we froze their bodies.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. madmemere says:

    It was previously noted elsewhere, the “washerwoman slut” wears a snarly string mop in place of hair and the only thing under the mop is vacant space; that’s why her eyes keep crossing- – there’s nothing to hold them in place. I haven’t decided if her speech impediment is a permanent lisp, or if she is, actually, tongue-tied.


  5. JCscuba says:

    June, as I recall you were a nice, kind gentle woman, has hanging out with me turned you into a mean woman? Not a problem, I was married to one for 35 years 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  6. madmemere says:

    JC- Nothing has changed; I still prefer to be known as “a nice, kind, gentle woman” (thank you for that), but I speak truth, no pc, no sucking up and if the shoe fits, generally, I tell whomever to “wear it”!! I know, it’s going to get me in trouble; it’s happened before and probably will again. No, you didn’t “turn me into a mean woman”- – everyone has a “little mean streak” that pops up now and then; if you “keep poking it with a stick, it gets ugly”. You and I both know about being “married to one for 35 years”- – guess I was the luckier one; I managed to get away after 34 years- -lol.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.